Evidence-based Clinical Practice Guidelines for Interventional Pain Management in Cancer Pain
- PMID: 26009665
- PMCID: PMC4441173
- DOI: 10.4103/0973-1075.156466
Evidence-based Clinical Practice Guidelines for Interventional Pain Management in Cancer Pain
Abstract
Intractable cancer pain not amenable to standard oral or parenteral analgesics is a horrifying truth in 10-15% of patients. Interventional pain management techniques are an indispensable arsenal in pain physician's armamentarium for severe, intractable pain and can be broadly classified into neuroablative and neuromodulation techniques. An array of neurolytic techniques (chemical, thermal, or surgical) can be employed for ablation of individual nerve fibers, plexuses, or intrathecalneurolysis in patients with resistant pain and short life-expectancy. Neuraxial administration of drugs and spinal cord stimulation to modulate or alter the pain perception constitutes the most frequently employed neuromodulation techniques. Lately, there is a rising call for early introduction of interventional techniques in carefully selected patients simultaneously or even before starting strong opioids. After decades of empirical use, it is the need of the hour to head towards professionalism and standardization in order to secure credibility of specialization and those practicing it. Even though the interventional management has found a definite place in cancer pain, there is a dearth of evidence-based practice guidelines for interventional therapies in cancer pain. This may be because of paucity of good quality randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating their safety and efficacy in cancer pain. Laying standardized guidelines based on existing and emerging evidence will act as a foundation step towards strengthening, credentialing, and dissemination of the specialty of interventional cancer pain management. This will also ensure an improved decision-making and quality of life (QoL) of the suffering patients.
Keywords: Cancer pain; Celiac plexus block; Epidural opioids; Evidence-based; Guidelines; Interventions; Intrathecal drug delivery system; Lumbar sympathectomy; Neurolytic; Radiofrequency; Superior hypogastric; Vertebroplasty.
Conflict of interest statement
References
-
- Walid MS, Donahue SN, Darmohray DM, Hyer LA, Jr, Robinson JS., Jr Retraction. Regarding: The fifth vital sign-what does it mean? Pain Pract. 2008;6:417–22. Pain Pract 2009;9:245. - PubMed
-
- Sloan PA. Anesthesiological interventions for the management of cancer pain. In: Schmidt RF, Willis WD, editors. Encyclopedic Reference of Pain. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag; In Press.
-
- Sloan PA, Melzack R. Long-term patterns of morphine dosage and pain intensity among cancer patients. Hosp J. 1999;14:35–47. - PubMed
-
- World Health Organization. WHO's pain relief ladder. [Last accessed on 2015 Jan 11]. Available from: http://www.who.int/cancer/palliative/painladder/en/
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous