Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Jul;175(7):1180-6.
doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.1849.

Epidemiology of the Homebound Population in the United States

Katherine A Ornstein  1 , Bruce Leff  2 , Kenneth E Covinsky  3 , Christine S Ritchie  3 , Alex D Federman  4 , Laken Roberts  5 , Amy S Kelley  6 , Albert L Siu  6 , Sarah L Szanton  7
Affiliations

Epidemiology of the Homebound Population in the United States

Katherine A Ornstein et al. JAMA Intern Med. 2015 Jul.

Erratum in

  • Error in Figure and Text.
    [No authors listed] [No authors listed] JAMA Intern Med. 2015 Aug;175(8):1426. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.4022. JAMA Intern Med. 2015. PMID: 26236984 No abstract available.

Abstract

Importance: Increasing numbers of older, community-dwelling adults have functional impairments that prevent them from leaving their homes. It is uncertain how many people who live in the United States are homebound.

Objectives: To develop measures of the frequency of leaving and ability to leave the home and to use these measures to estimate the size of the homebound population in the US population.

Design, setting, and participants: Cross-sectional data from the National Health and Aging Trends Study collected in 2011 in the contiguous United States. Participants were a nationally representative sample of 7603 noninstitutionalized Medicare beneficiaries 65 years and older.

Main outcomes and measures: We defined homebound persons as those who never (completely homebound) or rarely (mostly homebound) left the home in the last month. We defined semihomebound persons as those who only left the home with assistance or had difficulty or needed help leaving the home. We compared demographic, clinical, and health care utilization characteristics across different homebound status categories.

Results: In 2011, the prevalence of homebound individuals was 5.6% (95% CI, 5.1%-6.2%), including an estimated 395,422 people who were completely homebound and 1,578,984 people who were mostly homebound. Among semihomebound individuals, the prevalence of those who never left home without personal assistance was 3.3% (95% CI, 2.8%-3.8%), and the prevalence of those who required help or had difficulty was 11.7% (95% CI, 10.9%-12.6%). Completely homebound individuals were more likely to be older (83.2 vs 74.3 years, P < .001), female (67.9% vs 53.4%, P < .006), and of nonwhite race (34.1% vs 17.6%, P < .001) and have less education and income than nonhomebound individuals. They also had more chronic conditions (4.9 vs 2.5) and were more likely to have been hospitalized in the last 12 months (52.1% vs 16.2%) (P < .001 for both). Only 11.9% of completely homebound individuals reported receiving primary care services at home.

Conclusions and relevance: In total, 5.6% of the elderly, community-dwelling Medicare population (approximately 2 million people) were completely or mostly homebound in 2011. Our findings can inform improvements in clinical and social services for these individuals.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of interest: None

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Determining homebound status using the National Health and Aging Trends Study (NHATS)
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Qiu WQ, Dean M, Liu T, et al. Physical and mental health of homebound older adults: an overlooked population. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2010;58(12):2423–2428. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cohen-Mansfield J, Shmotkin D, Hazan H. The effect of homebound status on older persons. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2010 Dec;58(12):2358–2362. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kellogg FR, Brickner PW. Long-term home health care for the impoverished frail homebound aged: a twenty-seven-year experience. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2000;48(8):1002–1011. - PubMed
    1. Kronish IM, Federman AD, Morrison RS, Boal J. Medication utilization in an urban homebound population. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2006;61(4):411–415. - PubMed
    1. Jencks SF, Williams MV, Coleman EA. Rehospitalizations among patients in the Medicare fee-for-service program. N Engl J Med. 2009;360(14):1418–1428. - PubMed

Publication types