Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Jun;110(6):828-34.
doi: 10.1038/ajg.2015.152. Epub 2015 May 26.

The Presence of Genetic Mutations at Key Loci Predicts Progression to Esophageal Adenocarcinoma in Barrett's Esophagus

Affiliations

The Presence of Genetic Mutations at Key Loci Predicts Progression to Esophageal Adenocarcinoma in Barrett's Esophagus

Swathi Eluri et al. Am J Gastroenterol. 2015 Jun.

Abstract

Objectives: Risk stratification in Barrett's esophagus (BE) is challenging. We evaluated the ability of a panel of genetic markers to predict progression to high-grade dysplasia (HGD) or esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC).

Methods: In this case-control study, we assessed a measure of genetic instability, the mutational load (ML), in predicting progression to HGD or EAC. Cases had nondysplastic BE or low-grade dysplasia (LGD) at baseline and developed HGD/EAC ≥1 year later. Controls were matched 2:1, had nondysplastic BE or LGD, and no progression at follow-up. Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue was microdissected for the epithelium. Loss of heterozygosity (LOH) and microsatellite instability (MSI) were assessed. ML was calculated from derangements in 10 genomic loci. High-clonality LOH mutations were assigned a value of 1, low-clonality mutations were assigned a value of 0.5, and MSI 0.75 at the first loci, and 0.5 for additional loci. These values were summed to the ML. Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves were created.

Results: There were 69 patients (46 controls and 23 cases). Groups were similar in age, follow-up time, baseline histology, and the number of microdissected targets. Mean ML in pre-progression biopsies was higher in cases (2.21) than in controls (0.42; P<0.0001). Sensitivity was 100% at ML ≥0.5 and specificity was 96% at ML ≥1.5. Accuracy was highest at 89.9% for ML ≥1. ROC curves for ML ≥1 demonstrated an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.95.

Conclusions: ML in pre-progression BE tissue predicts progression to HGD or EAC. Although further validation is necessary, ML may have utility as a biomarker in endoscopic surveillance of BE.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Mutational load (ML) of each nonprogressor and progressor patient at baseline index time point. ML per patient was the maximum ML in all microdissected histological targets at baseline time point for the patient. The most severe histology found in each patient's clinical pathology report at that same index time point is indicated as intestinal metaplasia (IM) or low-grade dysplasia (LGD) (IM=orange circle; LGD=green circle).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) for the performance of mutational load (ML) in predicting progression at baseline index time points for each patient. Area under the curve (AUC)=0.95 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.89–0.99).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) for performance of mutational load (ML) in predicting progression at baseline time points for each patient based on subsets of genomic loci included in ML calculations.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Thomas T, Abrams KR, De Caestecker JS, et al. Meta analysis: cancer risk in Barrett's oesophagus. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2007;26:1465–1477. - PubMed
    1. Yousef F, Cardwell C, Cantwell MM, et al. The incidence of esophageal cancer and high-grade dysplasia in Barrett's esophagus: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Epidemiol. 2008;168:237–249. - PubMed
    1. Haggitt RC, Tryzelaar J, Ellis FH, et al. Adenocarcinoma complicating columnar epithelium-lined (Barrett's) esophagus. Am J Clin Pathol. 1978;70:1–5. - PubMed
    1. Lerut T, De Leyn P, Coosemans W, et al. Surgical strategies in esophageal carcinoma with emphasis on radical lymphadenectomy. Ann Surg. 1992;216:583. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rastogi A, Puli S, El-Serag HB, et al. Incidence of esophageal adenocarcinoma in patients with Barrett's esophagus and high-grade dysplasia: a meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2008;67:394–398. - PubMed

Publication types

Supplementary concepts