Aripiprazole augmentation versus antidepressant switching for patients with major depressive disorder: A 6-week, randomized, rater-blinded, prospective study
- PMID: 26013203
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2015.04.020
Aripiprazole augmentation versus antidepressant switching for patients with major depressive disorder: A 6-week, randomized, rater-blinded, prospective study
Abstract
No study has directly compared the efficacy and tolerability of aripiprazole augmentation (AA) and antidepressant switching (SW) in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD). This is the first 6-week, randomized, rater-blinded, direct comparison study between AA and SW in outpatients. An inadequate response to antidepressants was defined as a total score ≥ 14 on the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale-item 17 (HDRS-17) despite adequate antidepressant dosage for at least 6 weeks in the current depressive episode. The primary endpoint was change in the total score of the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) from baseline to the end of treatment. Secondary efficacy measures included the response and remission rates as priori defined at the end of treatment: changes in total scores of the HDRS-17, Iowa Fatigue Scale (IFS), and Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) from baseline to the end of treatment and the proportion of patients who scored 1 or 2 on the Clinical Global Impression-Improvement Score (CGI-I) at the end of treatment. Tolerability was assessed with the Barnes Akathisia Rating Scale (BARS) and Arizona Sexual dysfunction scale (ASEX), and the numbers of adverse events were compared between the two groups. A total of 101 patients were randomized to either AA (n = 52) or SW (n = 49). The mean change in the MADRS score from baseline was significantly higher in the AA, with a difference in magnitude of -8.7 (p < 0.0001). The intergroup difference was first evident in week 2. The numbers of responders (p = 0.0086) and remitters (p = 0.0005) were also significantly higher in the AA (60% and 54%, respectively) compared with the SW (32.6% and 19.6%, respectively). On most secondary endpoints, AA showed better clinical outcomes compared to SW. The tolerability profiles were comparable between the two groups. Overall, AA yielded potentially beneficial clinical outcomes compared to SW. Given the methodological shortcomings of the present study, adequately powered, more rigorously controlled clinical trials are strongly warranted to confirm the present findings.
Keywords: Antidepressant; Aripiprazole; Augmentation; Major depressive disorder; Switching.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Aripiprazole augmentation, antidepressant combination or switching therapy in patients with major depressive disorder who are partial- or non-responsive to current antidepressants: a multi-center, naturalistic study.J Psychiatr Res. 2014 Feb;49:75-82. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2013.11.001. Epub 2013 Nov 12. J Psychiatr Res. 2014. PMID: 24268719 Clinical Trial.
-
Efficacy and tolerability of escitalopram versus citalopram in major depressive disorder: a 6-week, multicenter, prospective, randomized, double-blind, active-controlled study in adult outpatients.Clin Ther. 2007 Nov;29(11):2319-32. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2007.11.014. Clin Ther. 2007. PMID: 18158074 Clinical Trial.
-
The efficacy and safety of aripiprazole as adjunctive therapy in major depressive disorder: a second multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2008 Apr;28(2):156-65. doi: 10.1097/JCP.0b013e31816774f9. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2008. PMID: 18344725 Clinical Trial.
-
Efficacy and safety of aripiprazole or bupropion augmentation and switching in patients with treatment-resistant depression or major depressive disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.PLoS One. 2024 Apr 26;19(4):e0299020. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0299020. eCollection 2024. PLoS One. 2024. PMID: 38669232 Free PMC article.
-
Vortioxetine versus Duloxetine in the Treatment of Patients with Major Depressive Disorder: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Clin Drug Investig. 2016 Jul;36(7):509-17. doi: 10.1007/s40261-016-0396-9. Clin Drug Investig. 2016. PMID: 27067232 Review.
Cited by
-
Second Generation Antipsychotics in the Treatment of Major Depressive Disorder: An Update.Chonnam Med J. 2016 Sep;52(3):159-72. doi: 10.4068/cmj.2016.52.3.159. Epub 2016 Sep 23. Chonnam Med J. 2016. PMID: 27689026 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Results from a long-term open-label extension study of adjunctive buprenorphine/samidorphan combination in patients with major depressive disorder.Neuropsychopharmacology. 2019 Dec;44(13):2268-2276. doi: 10.1038/s41386-019-0451-3. Epub 2019 Jun 29. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2019. PMID: 31254971 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Management of Treatment-Resistant Depression in Real-World Clinical Practice Settings Across Asia.Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2020 Dec 3;16:2943-2959. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S264813. eCollection 2020. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2020. PMID: 33299316 Free PMC article.
-
Pharmacological Treatments for Patients with Treatment-Resistant Depression.Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2020 Jun 4;13(6):116. doi: 10.3390/ph13060116. Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2020. PMID: 32512768 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Effect of Antidepressant Switching vs Augmentation on Remission Among Patients With Major Depressive Disorder Unresponsive to Antidepressant Treatment: The VAST-D Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA. 2017 Jul 11;318(2):132-145. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.8036. JAMA. 2017. PMID: 28697253 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical