Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2015 Aug;17(4):575-84.
doi: 10.1007/s11307-015-0866-0.

Comparison of [(18)F]DCFPyL and [ (68)Ga]Ga-PSMA-HBED-CC for PSMA-PET Imaging in Patients with Relapsed Prostate Cancer

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Comparison of [(18)F]DCFPyL and [ (68)Ga]Ga-PSMA-HBED-CC for PSMA-PET Imaging in Patients with Relapsed Prostate Cancer

Markus Dietlein et al. Mol Imaging Biol. 2015 Aug.

Abstract

Purpose: Gallium-68 (Ga-68)-labeled tracers for imaging expression of the prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) such as the [(68)Ga]Ga-PSMA-HBED-CC have already demonstrated high potential for the detection of recurrent prostate cancer. However, compared to Ga-68, a labeling with fluorine-18 (F-18) would offer advantages with respect to availability, production amount, and image resolution. [(18)F]DCFPyL is a promising F-18-labeled candidate for PSMA-positron emission tomography (PET) imaging that has been recently introduced. In the current study, we aimed to compare [(68)Ga]Ga-PSMA-HBED-CC and [(18)F]DCFPyL for clinical use in biochemically relapsed prostate cancer.

Procedures: In 14 selected patients with PSA relapse of prostate cancer, [(18)F]DCFPyL PET/X-ray computed tomography (CT) was performed in addition to [(68)Ga]Ga-PSMA-HBED-CC PET/CT. A systematic comparison was carried out between results obtained with both tracers with regard to the number of detected PSMA-positive lesions, the standardized uptake value (SUV)max and the lesion to background ratios.

Results: All suspicious lesions identified by [(68)Ga]Ga-PSMA-HBED-CC were also detected with [(18)F]DCFPyL. In three patients, additional lesions were observed using [(18)F]DCFPyL PET/CT. The mean SUVmax in the concordant [(18)F]DCFPyL PSMA-positive lesions was significantly higher as compared to [(68)Ga]Ga-PSMA-HBED-CC (14.5 vs. 12.2, p = 0.028, n = 15). The mean tumor to background ratios (n = 15) were significantly higher for [(18)F]DCFPyL compared to [(68)Ga]Ga-PSMA-HBED-CC using kidney, spleen, or parotid as reference organs (p = 0.006, p = 0.002, p = 0.008), but no significant differences were found using the liver (p = 0.167) or the mediastinum (p = 0.363) as reference organs.

Conclusion: [(18)F]DCFPyL PET/CT provided a high image quality and visualized small prostate lesions with excellent sensitivity. [(18)F]DCFPyL represents a highly promising alternative to [(68)Ga]Ga-PSMA-HBED-CC for PSMA-PET/CT imaging in relapsed prostate cancer.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Patient no. 12 with a rising PSA level of 3.87 ng/ml. In the past, the patient had retroperitoneal lymph node metastases, which were irradiated. On a Biograph mCT 128 scanner, comparison between a MIP (maximum intensity projection) with [18F]DCFPyL and b MIP with [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-HBED-CC. [18F]DCFPyL PET/CT clearly demonstrates several additional supradiaphragmatic PSMA-positive lesions. [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-HBED-CC PET/CT showed the supradiaphragmal lesion in the sternum.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Patient no. 12, Biograph mCT 128. [18F]DCFPyL PET/CT (b) was suspicious of an additional lymph node metastasis in the dorsal mediastinum, visible as a normal-sized lymph node in a low-dose CT scan without tracer accumulation on c [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-HBED-CC PET/CT. d Low-dose CT in bone window and e [18F]DCFPyL PET/CT were suspicious of a bone metastasis in vertebra Th3, barely detectable in f [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-HBED-CC PET/CT. h [18F]DCFPyL PET/CT was clearly suspicious of bone metastasis in the processus xiphoideus sterni, hard to detect in g low-dose CT or i [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-HBED-CC PET/CT.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Patient no. 2 with a rising PSA level of 4.7 ng/ml. a Low-dose CT in bone window and b [18F]DCFPyL PET/CT were suspicious of bone metastasis in vertebra L2, hard to discern in the c [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-HBED-CC PET/CT. Imaging was performed on a Biograph 16 PET/CT.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Patient no. 7 with a rising PSA level to 1.3 ng/ml. In the past, the patient had left iliac lymph node dissection with histologically confirmed lymph node metastases. Both tracers have shown a left iliac PSMA-avid lymph node, which was confirmed as metastasis (ac). Additionally, e the [18F]DCFPyL PET/CT was suspicious of a second PSMA-positive lymph node below the bifurcation of the v. cava inferior, visible as a normal-sized lymph node on d CT, hard to detected on f [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-HBED-CC PET/CT. a Low-dose CT scan, b [18F]DCFPyL PET/CT, and c [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-HBED-CC PET/CT at the level of the iliacae communes._d Low-dose CT scan, e [18F]DCFPyL PET/CT, and f [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-HBED-CC PET/CT at the level of the bifurcation. Imaging was performed on a Biograph 16 PET/CT.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
a Ratio of SUVmax in lesions to SUVmean in the kidney and b ratio of SUVmax in lesions to SUVmean in the liver. The blue columns represent [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-HBED-CC PET/CT, and the red columns represent [18F]DCFPyL PET/CT. [18F]DCFPyL showed a higher tumor to background ratio than [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-HBED-CC when the kidney was used as a reference organ (p = 0.006, n = 15). The tumor to background ratio did not differ significantly between [18F]DCFPyL and [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-HBED-CC when the liver was used as a reference organ (p = 0.167, n = 15). LN lymph node metastasis, LR local relapse, BM bone metastasis.

References

    1. Silver DA, Pellicer I, Fair WR, et al. Prostate-specific membrane antigen expression in normal and malignant human tissues. Clin Cancer Res. 1997;3:81–85. - PubMed
    1. Afshar-Oromieh A, Malcher A, Eder M, et al. PET imaging with a [68Ga]gallium-labelled PSMA ligand for the diagnosis of prostate cancer: biodistribution in humans and first evaluation of tumour lesions. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2013;40:486–495. doi: 10.1007/s00259-012-2298-2. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Afshar-Oromieh A, Zechmann CM, Malcher A, et al. Comparison of PET imaging with a 68Ga-labelled PSMA ligand and 18F-choline-based PET/CT for the diagnosis of recurrent prostate cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2014;41(1):11–20. doi: 10.1007/s00259-013-2525-5. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Afshar-Oromieh A, Haberkorn U, Schlemmer HP, et al. Comparison of PET/CT and PET/MRI hybrid systems using a 68Ga-labelled PSMA ligand for the diagnosis of recurrent prostate cancer: initial experience. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2014;41(5):887–897. doi: 10.1007/s00259-013-2660-z. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Afshar-Oromieh A, Avtzi E, Giesel FL, et al. The diagnostic value of PET/CT imaging with the 68Ga-labelled PSMA ligand HBED-CC in the diagnosis of recurrent prostate cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2015;42:197–209. doi: 10.1007/s00259-014-2949-6. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms