Health-Related Quality of Life in a Randomized Phase III Study of Bevacizumab, Temozolomide, and Radiotherapy in Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma
- PMID: 26014298
- DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2014.60.3217
Health-Related Quality of Life in a Randomized Phase III Study of Bevacizumab, Temozolomide, and Radiotherapy in Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma
Abstract
Purpose: As glioblastoma progresses, patients experience a decline in health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Delaying this decline is an important treatment goal. In newly diagnosed glioblastoma, progression-free survival was prolonged when bevacizumab was added to radiotherapy plus temozolomide (RT/TMZ) versus placebo plus RT/TMZ (phase III AVAglio study; hazard ratio, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.55 to 0.74; P < .001). To ensure that addition of bevacizumab to standard-of-care therapy was not associated with HRQoL detriment, HRQoL assessment was a secondary objective.
Patients and methods: Patients completed European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaires C30 and BN20 at each tumor assessment (Appendix Table A1, online only). Raw scores were converted to a 100-point scale and mean changes from baseline scores were evaluated (stable: < 10-point change; clinically relevant deterioration/improvement: ≥ 10-point change). Deterioration-free survival was the time to deterioration/progression/death; time to deterioration was the time to deterioration/death.
Results: Most evaluable patients who had not progressed (> 74%) completed all HRQoL assessments for at least 1 year of treatment, and almost all completed at least one HRQoL assessment at baseline (98.3% and 97.6%, bevacizumab and placebo arms, respectively). Mean changes from baseline did not reach a clinically relevant difference between arms for most items. HRQoL declined at progression in both arms. The addition of bevacizumab to RT/TMZ resulted in statistically longer (P < .001) deterioration-free survival across all items. Time to deterioration was not statistically longer in the placebo plus RT/TMZ arm (v bevacizumab) for any HRQoL item.
Conclusion: The addition of bevacizumab to standard-of-care treatment for newly diagnosed glioblastoma had no impact on HRQoL during the progression-free period.
Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00943826.
© 2015 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.
Comment in
-
Neuro-oncology: What is the optimal use of bevacizumab in glioblastoma?Nat Rev Neurol. 2015 Aug;11(8):429-30. doi: 10.1038/nrneurol.2015.127. Epub 2015 Jul 21. Nat Rev Neurol. 2015. PMID: 26195258 No abstract available.
-
Reply to M.C. Chamberlain.J Clin Oncol. 2016 Jan 20;34(3):292. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.64.3072. Epub 2015 Nov 30. J Clin Oncol. 2016. PMID: 26628468 No abstract available.
-
Similar Trials With Differing Outcomes: Reconciliation in Glioblastoma.J Clin Oncol. 2016 Jan 20;34(3):291-2. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.64.1746. Epub 2015 Nov 30. J Clin Oncol. 2016. PMID: 26628477 No abstract available.
-
Identification of Patients Who Benefit From Bevacizumab in High-Grade Glioma-An Easy Question Turned Difficult: Treat the Scan or the Patient?J Clin Oncol. 2016 Apr 10;34(11):1281-2. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.64.7883. Epub 2016 Feb 16. J Clin Oncol. 2016. PMID: 26884565 No abstract available.
-
Reply to T.J. Kruser et al.J Clin Oncol. 2016 Apr 10;34(11):1282-3. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.65.2438. Epub 2016 Feb 16. J Clin Oncol. 2016. PMID: 26884575 No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials