Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2015 Sep;18(13):2402-6.
doi: 10.1017/S1368980015001706. Epub 2015 May 28.

A workplace farmstand pilot programme in Omaha, Nebraska, USA

Farryl M W Bertmann  1 , Hollyanne E Fricke  2 , Leah R Carpenter  2 , Daniel J Schober  2 , Teresa M Smith  2 , Courtney A Pinard  2 , Amy L Yaroch  2
Affiliations
Review

A workplace farmstand pilot programme in Omaha, Nebraska, USA

Farryl M W Bertmann et al. Public Health Nutr. 2015 Sep.

Abstract

Objective: To explore the feasibility of a workplace farmstand programme through the utilization of an online ordering system to build awareness for local food systems, encourage community participation, and increase local fruit and vegetable availability.

Design: A 4-week pilot to explore feasibility of workplace farmstand programmes through a variety of outcome measures, including survey, mode of sale, weekly sales totals and intercept interviews.

Setting: A large private company in Sarpy County, Omaha, Nebraska, USA.

Subjects: Employees of the company hosting the farmstand programme.

Results: Pre-programme, a majority of employees indicated that quality (95·4 %), variety (94·6 %) and cost of fruits and vegetables (86·4 %) were driving factors in their fruit and vegetable selection when shopping. The availability of locally or regionally produced fruits and vegetables was highly important (78·1 %). Participants varied in their definition of local food, with nearly half (49·2 %) reporting within 80·5 km (50 miles), followed by 160·9 km (100 miles; 29·5 %) and 321·9 km (200 miles; 12·1 %). Weekly farmstand purchases (both walk-ups and online orders) ranged from twenty-eight to thirty-nine employees, with weekly sales ranging from $US 257·95 to 436·90 for the producer. The mode of purchase changed throughout the pilot, with higher use of online ordering in the beginning and higher use of walk-up purchasing at the end.

Conclusions: The workplace farmstand pilot study revealed initial interest by both employees and a producer in this type of programme, helped to establish a sustained producer-employer relationship and led to additional opportunities for both the producer and employer.

Keywords: Farmstand; Local food systems; Pilot programme; Sustainability.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Neshiem MC, Oria M, Yih PT et al.. (2015) A Framework for Assessing Effects of the Food System. Washington, DC: Institute of Medicine, National Research Council; available at http://www.nap.edu/catalog/18846/a-framework-for-assessing-effects-of-th... - PubMed
    1. American Public Health Association (2007) Toward a Healthy Sustainable Food System. http://www.apha.org/policies-and-advocacy/public-health-policy-statement... (accessed February 2015).
    1. Finney Rutten L, Yaroch AL, Patrick H et al.. (2012) Obesity prevention and national food security: a food systems approach. Int Sch Res Not 2012, article ID 539764.
    1. Story M, Hamm MW & Wallinga D (2009) Food systems and public health: linkages to achieve healthier diets and healthier communities. J Hunger Environ Nutr 4, 219–224. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pinard CA, Kim SA, Story M et al.. (2013) The food and water system: impacts on obesity. J Law Med Ethics 41, 52–60. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms