Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2015 May 28:10:80.
doi: 10.1186/s13018-015-0226-4.

Comparison of four different reduction methods for anterior dislocation of the shoulder

Olcay Guler  1 , Safak Ekinci  2 , Faruk Akyildiz  3 , Uzeyir Tirmik  4 , Selami Cakmak  5 , Akin Ugras  6 , Ahmet Piskin  7 , Mahir Mahirogullari  6
Affiliations
Comparative Study

Comparison of four different reduction methods for anterior dislocation of the shoulder

Olcay Guler et al. J Orthop Surg Res. .

Abstract

Background: Shoulder dislocations account for almost 50% of all major joint dislocations and are mainly anterior.

Objective: The aim is a comparative retrospective study of different reduction maneuvers without anesthesia to reduce the dislocated shoulder.

Methods: Patients were treated with different reduction maneuvers, including various forms of traction and external rotation, in the emergency departments of four training hospitals between 2009 and 2012. Each of the four hospitals had different treatment protocols for reduction and applying one of four maneuvers: Spaso, Chair, Kocher, and Matsen methods. Thirty-nine patients were treated by the Spaso method, 47 by the Chair reduction method, 40 by the Kocher method, and 27 patients by Matsen's traction-countertraction method. All patients' demographic data were recorded. Dislocation number, reduction time, time interval between dislocation and reduction, and associated complications, pre- and post-reduction period, were recorded prospectively. No anesthetic method was used for the reduction.

Results: All of the methods used included traction and some external rotation. The Chair method had the shortest reduction time. All surgeons involved in the study agreed that the Kocher and Matsen methods needed more force for the reduction. Patients could contract their muscles because of the pain in these two methods. The Spaso method includes flexion of the shoulder and blocks muscle contraction somewhat. The Chair method was found to be the easiest because the patients could not contract their muscles while sitting on a chair with the affected arm at their side.

Conclusions: We suggest that the Chair method is an effective and fast reduction maneuver that may be an alternative for the treatment of anterior shoulder dislocations. Further prospective studies with larger sample size are needed to compare safety of different reduction techniques.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Position of the patient in Kocher’s technique
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Spaso method of reduction for shoulder dislocation
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Chair method of reduction for shoulder dislocation
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Matsen’s traction-countertraction method of reduction for shoulder dislocation
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Blake R, Hoffman J. Emergency department evaluation and treatment of the shoulder and humerus. Emerg Med Clin North Am. 1999;17:859–76. doi: 10.1016/S0733-8627(05)70101-2. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hill JA. Epidemiologic perspective on shoulder injuries. Clin Sports Med. 1993;2:241–7. - PubMed
    1. Kroner K, Lind T, Jensen J. The epidemiology of shoulder dislocations. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 1989;108:288–90. doi: 10.1007/BF00932317. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ideburg R. Fractures of the scapula involving the glenoid fossa. In: Bateman JE, Walsh RP, editors. Surgery of the shoulder. Philadelphia: BC Decker; 1984. pp. 63–6.
    1. Cunningham NJ. Techniques for reduction of anteroinferior shoulder dislocation. Emerg Med Australas. 2005;17:463–71. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-6723.2005.00778.x. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types