Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 May 28:8:288.
doi: 10.1186/s13071-015-0895-1.

Genetic interrelationships of North American populations of giant liver fluke Fascioloides magna

Affiliations

Genetic interrelationships of North American populations of giant liver fluke Fascioloides magna

Eva Bazsalovicsová et al. Parasit Vectors. .

Abstract

Background: Population structure and genetic interrelationships of giant liver fluke Fascioloides magna from all enzootic North American regions were revealed in close relation with geographical distribution of its obligate definitive cervid hosts for the first time.

Methods: Variable fragments of the mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (cox1; 384 bp) and nicotinamide dehydrogenase subunit I (nad1; 405 bp) were applied as a tool. The concatenated data set of both cox1 and nad1 sequences (789 bp) contained 222 sequences that resulted in 50 haplotypes. Genetic data were analysed using Bayesian Inference (BI), Maximum Likelihood (ML) and Analysis of Molecular Variance (AMOVA).

Results: Phylogenetic analysis revealed two major clades of F. magna, which separated the parasite into western and eastern populations. Western populations included samples from Rocky Mountain trench (Alberta) and northern Pacific coast (British Columbia and Oregon), whereas, the eastern populations were represented by individuals from the Great Lakes region (Minnesota), Gulf coast, lower Mississippi, and southern Atlantic seaboard region (Mississippi, Louisiana, South Carolina, Georgia, Florida) and northern Quebec and Labrador. Haplotype network and results of AMOVA analysis confirmed explicit genetic separation of western and eastern populations of the parasite that suggests long term historical isolation of F. magna populations.

Conclusion: The genetic makeup of the parasite's populations correlates with data on historical distribution of its hosts. Based on the mitochondrial data there are no signs of host specificity of F. magna adults towards any definitive host species; the detected haplotypes of giant liver fluke are shared amongst several host species in adjacent populations.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Distribution of concatenated mtDNA haplotypes (for details see Table 4) of Fascioloides magna in North America. Geographic origin of F. magna individuals analysed in the current work is displayed as dark grey regions. Codes for US states and Canadian provinces are explained in Table 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Maximum likelihood phylogeny of Fascioloides magna concatenated mitochondrial haplotypes. Bootstrap/posterior probability statistics higher than 50 % and 0.80, respectively, are provided above respective branches in bold. Codes for enzootic regions, US states and Canadian provinces are explained in Table 1. Phylogeny was rooted using a separate amino acid sequence analysis in PhyML using Fasciola hepatica as outgroup (outgroup not shown)
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Haplotype network of Fascioloides magna populations obtained in TCS. Each haplotype is represented by a circle scaled according to the number of specimens. Empty circles along the mutation pathways represent putative unsampled haplotypes. Codes for enzootic regions, US states and Canadian provinces are explained in Table 1

References

    1. Prugnolle F, Liua H, de Meeu T, Ballouxa F. Population genetics of complex life-cycle parasites: an illustration with trematodes. Int J Parasitol. 2005;35:255–63. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpara.2004.10.027. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Štefka J, Hypša V, Scholz T. Interplay of host specificity and biogeography in the population structure of a cosmopolitan endoparasite: microsatellite study of Ligula intestinalis (Cestoda) Mol Ecol. 2009;18:1187–206. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2008.04074.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Poulin R, Krasnov BR, Mouillot D, Thieltges DW. The comparative ecology and biogeography of parasites. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2011;366:2379–90. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2011.0048. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Renaud F, Clayton D, de Meeüs T. Biodiversity and evolution in host-parasite associations. Biodivers Conserv. 1996;5:963–74. doi: 10.1007/BF00054414. - DOI
    1. Salzet M, Capron A, Stefano GB. Molecular crosstalk in host-parasite relationships: schistosome and leech host interactions. Parasitol Today. 2000;16:536–40. doi: 10.1016/S0169-4758(00)01787-7. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances

LinkOut - more resources