Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2015 May 29:15:210.
doi: 10.1186/s12913-015-0871-7.

Making health insurance pro-poor: evidence from a household panel in rural China

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Making health insurance pro-poor: evidence from a household panel in rural China

Mateusz J Filipski et al. BMC Health Serv Res. .

Abstract

Background: In 2002, China launched the largest public health insurance scheme in the world, the New Cooperative Medical Scheme (NCMS). It is intended to enable rural populations to access health care services, and to curb medical impoverishment. Whether the scheme can reach its equity goals depends on how it is used, and by whom. Our goal is to shed light on whether and how income levels affect the ability of members to reap insurance benefits.

Methods: We exploit primary panel data consisting of a complete census (over 3500 individuals) in three villages in Puding County, Guizhou province, collected in 2004, 2006, 2009 and 2011. Data was collected during in-person interviews with household member(s). The data include yearly gross and net medical expenses for all individuals, and socio-economic information. We apply probit, ordinary least squares, and tobit multivariate regression analyses to the three waves in which NCMS was active (2006, 2009 and 2011). Explained variables include obtainment, levels and rates of NCMS reimbursement. Household income is the main explanatory variable, with household- and individual-level controls. We restrict samples to rule out self-selection, and exploit the 2009 NCMS reform to highlight equity-enhancing features of insurance.

Results: Prior to 2009 reforms, higher income in our sample was statistically significantly related to higher probability of obtaining reimbursement, as well as higher levels and rates of reimbursement. These relations all disappear after the reform, suggesting lower-income households were better able to reap insurance benefits after the scheme was reformed. Regression results suggest this is partly explained by reimbursement for chronic diseases.

Conclusions: The post-reform NCMS distributed benefits more equitably in our study area. Making health insurance pro-poor may require a focus on outpatient costs, credit constraints and chronic diseases, rather than catastrophic illnesses.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Wagstaff A. Poverty and health sector inequalities. Bull World Health Organ. 2002;80(2):97–105. - PMC - PubMed
    1. O’Donnell O, Van Doorslaer E, Wagstaff A, Lindelow M: Analyzing Health Equity Using Household Survey Data: A Guide to Techniques and Their Implementation. World Bank. http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTPAH/Resources/Publications/459843-...
    1. Pritchett L, Summers L. Wealthier is healthier. J Hum Resour. 1996;31:841–68. doi: 10.2307/146149. - DOI
    1. Van Doorslaer E, Wagstaff A, Bleichrodt H, Calonge S, Gerdtham U-G, Gerfin M, et al. Income-related inequalities in health: some international comparisons. J Health Econ. 1997;16:93–112. doi: 10.1016/S0167-6296(96)00532-2. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bartley M. Health Inequality: An Introduction to Theories, Concepts and Methods. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press, Blackwell Publishing; 2004. p. 224.

Publication types

MeSH terms