Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2015 Jun;135(6):1025e-1046e.
doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000001273.

Contemporary solutions for the treatment of facial nerve paralysis

Affiliations
Review

Contemporary solutions for the treatment of facial nerve paralysis

Ryan M Garcia et al. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015 Jun.

Abstract

Learning objectives: After reviewing this article, the participant should be able to: 1. Understand the most modern indications and technique for neurotization, including masseter-to-facial nerve transfer (fifth-to-seventh cranial nerve transfer). 2. Contrast the advantages and limitations associated with contiguous muscle transfers and free-muscle transfers for facial reanimation. 3. Understand the indications for a two-stage and one-stage free gracilis muscle transfer for facial reanimation. 4. Apply nonsurgical adjuvant treatments for acute facial nerve paralysis.

Summary: Facial expression is a complex neuromotor and psychomotor process that is disrupted in patients with facial paralysis breaking the link between emotion and physical expression. Contemporary reconstructive options are being implemented in patients with facial paralysis. While static procedures provide facial symmetry at rest, true 'facial reanimation' requires restoration of facial movement. Contemporary treatment options include neurotization procedures (a new motor nerve is used to restore innervation to a viable muscle), contiguous regional muscle transfer (most commonly temporalis muscle transfer), microsurgical free muscle transfer, and nonsurgical adjuvants used to balance facial symmetry. Each approach has advantages and disadvantages along with ongoing controversies and should be individualized for each patient. Treatments for patients with facial paralysis continue to evolve in order to restore the complex psychomotor process of facial expression.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

References

    1. Lindsay RW, Edwards C, Smitson C, et al. A systematic algorithm for the management of lower lip asymmetry. Am J Otolaryngol. 2011;32:1–7
    1. Rab M, Haslik W, Grünbeck M, et al. Free functional muscle transplantation for facial reanimation: Experimental comparison between the one- and two-stage approach. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2006;59:797–806
    1. Bianchi B, Copelli C, Ferrari S, et al. Facial animation with free-muscle transfer innervated by the masseter motor nerve in unilateral facial paralysis. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010;68:1524–1529
    1. Horta R, Silva P, Silva A, et al. Facial reanimation with gracilis muscle transplantation and obturator nerve coaptation to the motor nerve of masseter muscle as a salvage procedure in an unreliable cross-face nerve graft. Microsurgery. 2011;31:164–166
    1. Cotrufo S, Hart A, Payne AP, et al. Topographic anatomy of the nerve to masseter: An anatomical and clinical study. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2011;64:1424–1429

MeSH terms

Substances

LinkOut - more resources