Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Apr 30;82(1):887.
doi: 10.4102/ojvr.v82i1.887.

Determination of the optimal time of vaccination against infectious bursal disease virus (Gumboro) in Algeria

Affiliations

Determination of the optimal time of vaccination against infectious bursal disease virus (Gumboro) in Algeria

Omar Besseboua et al. Onderstepoort J Vet Res. .

Abstract

This study was conducted to determine the effect of maternally derived antibody (MDA) on live vaccine against infectious bursal disease. A total of 140 chicks selected from vaccinated parent stock were used in this investigation. In a preset vaccination schedule, blood samples were collected to check for the actual effect. It was noticed that on day 1 the chicks contained a high level (6400.54 ± 2993.67) of maternally derived antibody that gradually decreased below a positive level within 21 days (365.86 ± 634.46). It was found that a high level of MDA interferes with the vaccine virus, resulting in no immune response. For better immune response, it is suggested that the chickens should be vaccinated at day 21, as the uniformity of MDA is poor (coefficient of the variation [CV] > 30%), and boosted at day 28. Indeed, two vaccinations are necessary to achieve good protection against infectious bursal disease virus of the entire flock.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no financial or personal relationships which may have inappropriately influenced them in writing this article.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Coefficient of variation (CV%) of the maternally derived antibody titres of non-vaccinated chicks (Groups A, B, C, D, E and F) from vaccinated parent stock at different ages (days 1, 7, 10, 14, 21 and 28).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Alam J., Rahman M.M., Sil B.K., Khan M.S.R. & Sarker M.S.K., 2002, ‘Effect of maternally derived antibody on vaccination against infectious bursal disease (Gumboro) with live vaccine in broiler’, International Journal of Poultry Science 1(4), 98–101. http://dx.doi.org/10.3923/ijps.2002.98.101 - DOI
    1. Ali A.S., Abdalla M.O. & Mohammed M.E.H., 2004, ‘Interaction between Newcastle disease and infectious bursal disease vaccines commonly used in Sudan’, International Journal of Poultry Science 3, 300–304. http://dx.doi.org/10.3923/ijps.2004.300.304 - DOI
    1. Al Mayah I.M.D. & Al Mayah A.A.S., 2013,. ‘Antibody response of broiler chickens against eight commercial infectious bursal disease live vaccines tested by ELISA’, Mirror of Research in Veterinary Sciences and Animals 2(2), 1–7.
    1. Al-Mufarrej S.I.A., 2013, ‘A comparative study of two vaccines against infectious bursal disease in newly hatched broiler chickens’, Agricultural Journal 8, 101–105.
    1. Amer M.M., El-Bayomi K.M., Kotkat M., Abd A., Wafaa A., Shakal M.A. et al. , 2007, ‘The efficacy of live infectious bursal disease vaccines in commercial 10 days old chicks’, Proceedings of the 5th Scientific Conference, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Beni Suef University, Egypt, Nov-09, 2007, pp. 23–33.

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources