Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Mar 1;17(3):e19030.
doi: 10.5812/ircmj.19030. eCollection 2015 Mar.

Developing of the appropriateness evaluation protocol for public hospitals in iran

Anvar Esmaili  1 , Hamid Ravaghi  2 , Hesam Seyedin  3 , Bahram Delgoshaei  2 , Masoud Salehi  3
Affiliations

Developing of the appropriateness evaluation protocol for public hospitals in iran

Anvar Esmaili et al. Iran Red Crescent Med J. .

Abstract

Background: Employment of utilization review instruments is a method for managing costs and efficiency in the healthcare systems.

Objectives: This study developed an instrument for measuring the level of inappropriate acute hospital admissions and days of care in Iran.

Patients and methods: The American version of the Appropriateness Evaluation Protocol (AEP) was modified, using the agreement method, by a multidisciplinary group of physicians. We conducted a retrospective descriptive study of 273 randomly selected patients admitted to Imam Khomeini Hospital of Tehran University of Medical Sciences in Tehran, Iran. For the reliability study, two nurses were asked to review patients' medical records using the instrument. Validity was appraised by pairs of clinicians, including two general surgeons, two internists and two gynecologists. The degree of consensus between the three pairs of clinicians was compared with that of the nurses.

Results: Inter-rater and intra-rater reliability testing revealed an excellent level of consensus between the two nurses employing the AEP in all the studied departments. Overall agreement was > 92%, while the specific appropriate agreement and specific inappropriate agreement were > 88% and > 83%, respectively. External validity testing of the instrument yielded a sensitivity > 0.785, specificity > 0.55, and positive and negative predictive values > 0.775 and > 0.555, respectively. The kappa statistic for the nurses who applied the AEP and clinicians using personal judgment were perfect (k > 0.85) and substantial (k > 0.68), respectively.

Conclusions: The results illustrate that the Iranian version of the AEP (IR-AEP) could be a reliable and valid instrument for assessing the level of inappropriate acute hospital admissions and days of care in the Iranian context.

Keywords: Appropriateness Review; Clinical Protocols; Iran; Reliability and Validity.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Kossovsky MP, Chopard P, Bolla F, Sarasin FP, Louis-Simonet M, Allaz AF, et al. Evaluation of quality improvement interventions to reduce inappropriate hospital use. Int J Qual Health Care. 2002;14(3):227–32. - PubMed
    1. Iran SCI . Iran National Health Accounts; Annual Report, 2002 to 2007. In: Statistical Center of Iran, editor. Tehran: 2011.
    1. Esmail A. Development of the Paediatric Appropriateness Evaluation Protocol for use in the United Kingdom. J Public Health Med. 2000;22(2):224–30. - PubMed
    1. Gertman PM, Restuccia JD. The appropriateness evaluation protocol: a technique for assessing unnecessary days of hospital care. Med Care. 1981;19(8):855–71. - PubMed
    1. Panis LJ, Verheggen FW, Pop P. To stay or not to stay. The assessment of appropriate hospital stay: a Dutch report. Int J Qual Health Care. 2002;14(1):55–67. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources