Why should I do research? Is it a waste of time?
- PMID: 26019928
- PMCID: PMC4434536
- DOI: 10.1016/j.aju.2013.08.007
Why should I do research? Is it a waste of time?
Abstract
Objectives: To answer the questions 'Why should I do research? Is it a waste of time?' and present relevant issues.
Methods: Medline was used to identify relevant articles published from 2000 to 2013, using the following keywords 'medicine', 'research', 'purpose', 'study', 'trial', 'urology'.
Results: Research is the most important activity to achieve scientific progress. Although it is an easy process on a theoretical basis, practically it is a laborious process, and full commitment and dedication are of paramount importance. Currently, given that the financial crisis has a key influence in daily practice, the need to stress the real purpose of research is crucial.
Conclusion: Research is necessary and not a waste of time. Efforts to improving medical knowledge should be continuous.
Keywords: LoE, level of evidence; Purpose; R&D, research and development; RCT, randomised clinical trials; Research; Study; Trial; Urology.
References
-
- Karakiewicz P.I., Briganti A., Chun F.K.-H., Valiquette L. Outcomes research. A methodological review. Eur Urol. 2006;50:218–224. - PubMed
-
- Thompson I.M., Goodman P.J., Tangen C.M., Lucia M.S., Miller G.J., Ford L.G. The influence of finasteride on the development of prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2003;349:215–224. - PubMed
-
- Lotan Y., Cadeddu J.A., Lee J.J., Roehrborn C.G., Lippman S.M. Implications of the prostate cancer prevention trial: a decision analysis model of survival outcomes. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:1911–1920. - PubMed
-
- Lee C. Research enterprise in Urology: a message to the urology leadership. J Urol. 2003;170:189–191. - PubMed
-
- Lee C. The future of academic urologists. J Urol. 2000;163:1888–1889. - PubMed