'Minimum-incision' endoscopically assisted transvesical prostatectomy: Surgical technique and early outcomes
- PMID: 26019954
- PMCID: PMC4435772
- DOI: 10.1016/j.aju.2014.03.001
'Minimum-incision' endoscopically assisted transvesical prostatectomy: Surgical technique and early outcomes
Abstract
Objective: To describe the surgical technique and report the early outcomes of a 'minimum-incision' endoscopically assisted transvesical prostatectomy (MEATP) for managing benign prostatic obstruction secondary to a large (>80 g) prostate.
Patients and methods: In a prospective feasibility trial, 60 men with large benign prostates underwent MEATP. The baseline and postoperative evaluation included the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), a measurement of maximum urinary flow rate (Q max), and the postvoid residual (PVR) urine volume. The adenoma was enucleated digitally through a 3-cm suprapubic skin incision, and haemostasis was completed with endoscopic coagulation of the prostatic fossa. Perioperative complications were recorded and stratified according to the modified Clavien-Dindo score.
Results: The mean (SD, range) prostate weight estimated by ultrasonography was 102.9 (15.4, 80-160) g, the operative duration was 52 (8, 40-65) min, the haemoglobin loss was 2.1 (1, 0.4-5) g/dL, the catheterisation time was 5.2 (1.3, 4-9) days, and the hospital stay was 6.2 (1.4, 5-10) days. There were 21 complications recorded in 16 (27%) patients, and most (86%) were of grades 1 and 2. The most frequent complications were bleeding requiring a blood transfusion (8%), and prolonged drainage (5%). There was a significant improvement at 3 months after surgery in the IPSS (8.6 vs. 21.6, P < 0.001), Q max (19.5 vs. 7.7, P < 0.001), and PVR (15.8 vs. 83.9 mL, P < 0.001).
Conclusion: MEATP is feasible, safe and effective. Comparative studies and long-term data are required to determine its role in the surgical treatment of large-volume BPH.
Keywords: BPO, benign prostatic obstruction; Benign prostatic hyperplasia; Endoscopy; HoLEP, holmium laser enucleation of the prostate; MEATP, ‘minimum-incision’ endoscopically assisted transvesical prostatectomy; Minimum incision; OP, open prostatectomy; PVR, postvoid residual urine volume; Prostatectomy; Qmax, maximum urinary flow rate; STEP, single-port transvesical enucleation of the prostate; VAPS, visual analogue pain scale.
Figures
References
-
- Tubaro A., de Nunzio C. The current role of open surgery in BPH. EAU-EBU Update Ser. 2006;4:191–201.
-
- Ou R., You M., Tang P., Chen H., Deng X., Xie K. A randomized trial of transvesical prostatectomy versus transurethral resection of the prostate for prostate greater than 80 mL. Urology. 2010;76:958–961. - PubMed
-
- Kuntz R.M., Lehrich K., Ahyai S.A. Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate versus open prostatectomy for prostates greater than 100 g: 5-year follow-up results of a randomized clinical trial. Eur Urol. 2008;53:160–168. - PubMed
-
- Abdel-Hakim A.M., Habib E.I., El-Feel A.S., Elbaz A.G., Fayad A.M., Abdel-Hakim M.A. Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate: initial report of the first 230 Egyptian cases performed in a single centre. Urology. 2010;76:448–452. - PubMed
-
- Sotelo R., Spaliviero M., Garcia-Segui A., Hasan W., Novoa J., Desai M.M. Laparoscopic retropubic simple prostatectomy. J Urol. 2005;173:757–760. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Research Materials
Miscellaneous