Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 May 25;7(6):3949-58.
doi: 10.3390/nu7063949.

The Contribution of Fortified Ready-to-Eat Cereal to Vitamin and Mineral Intake in the U.S. Population, NHANES 2007-2010

Affiliations

The Contribution of Fortified Ready-to-Eat Cereal to Vitamin and Mineral Intake in the U.S. Population, NHANES 2007-2010

Victor L Fulgoni et al. Nutrients. .

Abstract

Micronutrients play a pivotal role in achieving and maintaining optimum health across all life stages. Much of the U.S. population fails to meet Estimated Average Requirements (EARs) for key nutrients. This analysis aims to assess the contribution of fortified ready-to-eat cereals (RTEC) to micronutrient intake for U.S. residents aged 2-18, 19-99, and 2-99 years of age according to National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2007-2010 data. We used the National Cancer Institute (NCI) method to assess usual intake of 21 micronutrients and the percentage of the population under EARs and above Tolerable Upper Intake Levels (UL). Without fortification of RTECs, the percentage of those aged 2-18 years that were below EARs increased by 155, 163, 113, and 35% for niacin, iron, thiamin, and vitamin A, respectively. For vitamins B6 and zinc, the respective numbers were 118% and 60%. Adults aged 19-99 and 2-99 had lower percentages but similar outcomes. RTECs are associated with improved nutrient adequacy and do not widely affect prevalence above the UL. The data indicate that large proportions of the population fail to achieve micronutrient sufficiency without fortification, and that its use can help Americans reach national nutrient intake goals.

Keywords: Estimated Average Requirements (EAR); Tolerable Upper Intake Levels (UL); adequate intake (AI); fortification; micronutrient intakes; ready-to-eat cereal (RTEC).

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Hennessy A., Walton J., Flynn A. The impact of voluntary food fortification on micronutrient intakes and status in European countries: A review. Proc. Nutr. Soc. 2013;72:433–440. doi: 10.1017/S002966511300339X. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Dwyer J.T., Woteki C., Bailey R., Britten P., Carriquiry A., Gaine P.C., Miller D., Moshfegh A., Murphy M.M., Smith Edge M. Fortification: New findings and implications. Nutr. Rev. 2014;72:127–141. doi: 10.1111/nure.12086. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hoeft B., Weber P., Eggersdorfer M. Micronutrients—A global perspective on intake, health benefits and economics. Int. J. Vitam. Nutr. Res. 2012;82:316–320. doi: 10.1024/0300-9831/a000125. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Berner L.A., Keast D.R., Bailey R.L., Dwyer J.T. Fortified foods are major contributors to nutrient intakes in diets of US children and adolescents. J. Acad. Nutr. Diet. 2014;114:1009–1022. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2013.10.012. - DOI - PubMed
    1. U.S. Department of Agriculture. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services . Dietary Guidelines for Americans. 7th ed. U.S. Government Printing Office; Washington, DC, USA: 2010.

Publication types