Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Jul 1;2(3):30.
eCollection 2013 Jul-Sep.

Gastrointestinal perforation in neonates: aetiology and risk factors

Affiliations

Gastrointestinal perforation in neonates: aetiology and risk factors

Ekwunife Okechukwu Hyginus et al. J Neonatal Surg. .

Abstract

Background: Gastrointestinal perforation (GIP) in neonates presents important challenges and mortality can be high. This is a report of recent experience with GIP in neonates in a developing country.

Patients and methods: A retrospective review of 16 neonates treated for GIP in a 3 year period.

Results: There were 9 males and 7 females, aged 0-28 days (median age =7days). Their weights at presentation ranged from 0.9 - 4.7kg (median =2.6). Five infants were premature. Twelve infants presented more than 72 hours after onset of symptoms. Plain abdominal radiographs showed peumoperitoneum in 9 infants. The cause of perforation was necrotising enterocolitis 6, intestinal obstruction 6, iatrogenic 3 and spontaneous 1. The site of perforation was ileum in 12 infants, stomach in 4 and colon in 4; 4 patients had involvement of more than one site. All the neonates underwent exploratory laparotomy with primary closure ( n=5) , resection and anastomosis( n=6), colostomy (n=3), Ileostomy ( n=2), partial gastrectomy (n=2) ,or gastrojejunostomy ( n=1). Two neonates had multiple procedures. Two very sick preterm babies had an initial peritoneal lavage. Surgical site infection is the commonest postoperative complication occurring in 9 infants. Anaesthesia sepsis and malnutrition is responsible for the seven deaths recorded.

Conclusions: Neonatal GIP has multiple aetiologies; NEC is the most common cause. Major mortality risk factors include NEC, multiple perforations, delayed presentation and prematurity.

Keywords: Aetiology; Intestine; Neonate; Perforation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

None
Figure 1:Abdominal wall necrosis
None
Table 1
None
Table 2
None
Table 3
None
Table 4

References

    1. Eltayeb AA, Hashem M. Management and outcome of neonatal bowel perforation. Ann Pediatr Surg. 2008; 4: 83-8.
    1. Fares AE, El- Saket HM. Neonatal Colonic Perforation: A Case Series. Arab J Gastroenterol 2008; 9(3): 75-9.
    1. Elhalaby EA, Elsamongy AF, Eldesoky NI, Dawoud HH, Darwish AA, Atia MA, et al. Neonatal gastrointestinal perforations. Egyptian J Surg. 2000; 19: 78-86.
    1. Chirdan LB, Ameh EA. Neonatal Intestinal Perforation in a Developing Country. Ann Trop Paediatr.2001; 21:26-8. - PubMed
    1. Fujii AM, Brown E, Mirochnick M, O'Brien S, Kaufman G. Neonatal Necrotizing Enterocolitis With Intestinal Perforation in Extremely Premature Infants Receiving Early Indomethacin Treatment for Patent Ductus Arteriosus. J Perinatol. 2002; 22: 535-40. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources