Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Apr;9(4):ZC38-41.
doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2015/13178.5824. Epub 2015 Apr 1.

Comparative assessment of sagittal skeletal discrepancy: a cephalometric study

Affiliations

Comparative assessment of sagittal skeletal discrepancy: a cephalometric study

P Aparna et al. J Clin Diagn Res. 2015 Apr.

Abstract

Background and objectives: Evaluating the sagittal apical base relationship during orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning is an important step. This study was aimed at comparison of Beta angle, ANB angle and Wit's appraisal for assessment of sagittal skeletal discrepancy.

Materials and methods: Eighty six young adults (43 female and 43 male) were selected from the patient's reporting to Department of Orthodontics, College of Dental Sciences, Davangere, India. Family lineage was studied to know the nativity of Davangere. The standardized pre-treatment lateral cephalogram of the chosen sample was traced. The sample was divided into three skeletal pattern groups: Class I, Class II and Class III, based on the ANB angle and profile, Beta angle was assessed in each group.

Statistical analysis: The data was subjected to statistical analysis student's t-test, ANOVA test and correlation and regression analysis, using the software namely SPSS Software version 13. Microsoft word and Excel were used to generate graphs and tables.

Results: In the local Davangere population, Class I skeletal pattern group exhibited Beta angle between 26°-34°, Beta angle less than 27° was found in Class II skeletal pattern, and Beta angle greater than 32° was seen Class III skeletal pattern. The coefficient of variation of Beta angle in all the three groups was significantly homogenous compared to ANB angle and Wits appraisal. The correlation and regression analysis of the total sample indicated a highly significant correlation between Beta angle and ANB angle (p<.001), and between Beta angle and Wits appraisal (p<.01).

Conclusion: Beta angle can be used to classify subjects into different skeletal patterns. The Correlation and regression analysis for the total sample suggests a highly significant relation between Beta angle and ANB angle and, between Beta angle and Wits appraisal. It can be more reliably used to assess sagittal jaw discrepancies than ANB angle and Wits appraisal.

Keywords: ANB angle; Beta angle; Orthodontic diagnosis; Sagittal discrepancies; Skeletal pattern; Wits appraisal.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

[Table/Fig-1]:
[Table/Fig-1]:
Cephalometric measurements used in the study *Point A, Point B and Point C-Center of condyle † 1-ANB Angle, 2-Wit’s appraisal, 3-Beta angle
[Table/Fig-3]:
[Table/Fig-3]:
Comparison of coefficient of variation of Beta angle, ANB angle and Wits appraisal

References

    1. Millet D, Gravely JF. The assessment of Antero-posterior Dental Base relationships. Br J Orthod. 1991;18:285–97. - PubMed
    1. Downs WB. Variations in facial relationships: Their significance in treatment and prognosis. Am J Orthod. 1948;34:812–40. - PubMed
    1. Riedel RA. The relation of maxillary structures to cranium in malocclusion and in normal occlusion. Angle Orthod. 1952;22:140–45.
    1. Jacobson A. The “Wits” appraisal of jaw disharmony. Am J Orthod. 1975;67:125–38. - PubMed
    1. Baik CY, Ververidou M. A new approach of assessing sagittal discrepancies: The Beta angle. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2004;126:100–05. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources