Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2015 May 29;5(5):e008223.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008223.

The design of a multicentre Canadian surveillance study of sedation safety in the paediatric emergency department

Collaborators, Affiliations
Multicenter Study

The design of a multicentre Canadian surveillance study of sedation safety in the paediatric emergency department

Maala Bhatt et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Introduction: Procedural sedation and analgesia have become standard practice in paediatric emergency departments worldwide. Although generally regarded as safe, serious adverse events such as bradycardia, asystole, pulmonary aspiration, permanent neurological injury and death have been reported, but their incidence is unknown due to the infrequency of their occurrence and lack of surveillance of sedation safety. To improve our understanding of the safety, comparative effectiveness and variation in care in paediatric procedural sedation, we are establishing a multicentre patient registry with the goal of conducting regular and ongoing surveillance for adverse events in procedural sedation.

Methods: This multicentre, prospective cohort study is enrolling patients under 18 years of age from six paediatric emergency departments across Canada. Data collection is fully integrated into clinical care and is performed electronically in real time by the healthcare professionals caring for the patient. The primary outcome is the proportion of patients who experience a serious adverse event as a result of their sedation. Secondary outcomes include the proportion of patients who experience an adverse event that could lead to a serious adverse event, proportion of patients who receive a significant intervention in response to an adverse event, proportion of patients who experience a successful sedation, and proportion of patients who experience a paradoxical reaction to sedation. There is no predetermined end date for data collection.

Ethics and dissemination: Ethics approval has been obtained from participating sites. Results will be disseminated using a multifaceted knowledge translation strategy by presenting at international conferences, publication in peer-reviewed journals, and through established networks.

Keywords: Emergency medicine; Procedural sedation; pediatrics.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Havidich JE, Cravero JP. The current status of procedural sedation for pediatric patients in out-of-operating room locations. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2012;25:453–60. 10.1097/ACO.0b013e32835562d8 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Couloures KG, Beach ML, Cravero JP et al. . Impact of provider specialty on pediatric procedural sedation complication rates. Pediatrics 2011;127:e1154–60. 10.1542/peds.2010-2960 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cheung KW, Watson ML, Field S et al. . Aspiration pneumonitis requiring intubation after procedural sedation and analgesia: a case report. Ann Emerg Med 2007;49:462–4. 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2006.09.004 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cote CJ, Karl HW, Notterman DA et al. . Adverse sedation events in pediatrics: analysis of medications used for sedation. Pediatrics 2000;106:633–44. 10.1542/peds.106.4.633 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cote CJ, Notterman DA, Karl HW et al. . Adverse sedation events in pediatrics: a critical incident analysis of contributing factors. Pediatrics 2000;105:805–14. 10.1542/peds.105.4.805 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

Substances