Misuse of 'trend' to describe 'almost significant' differences in anaesthesia research
- PMID: 26025239
- DOI: 10.1093/bja/aev149
Misuse of 'trend' to describe 'almost significant' differences in anaesthesia research
Comment in
-
Misuse of 'trend' to describe 'almost significant' differences in anaesthesia research.Br J Anaesth. 2016 Jun;116(6):891-2. doi: 10.1093/bja/aew142. Br J Anaesth. 2016. PMID: 27199332 No abstract available.
-
Reply.Br J Anaesth. 2016 Jun;116(6):892. doi: 10.1093/bja/aew143. Br J Anaesth. 2016. PMID: 27199333 No abstract available.
-
'Trend' and 'almost significant' in anaesthesia research.Br J Anaesth. 2016 Jun;116(6):893. doi: 10.1093/bja/aew144. Br J Anaesth. 2016. PMID: 27199334 No abstract available.
-
Reply.Br J Anaesth. 2016 Jun;116(6):893. doi: 10.1093/bja/aew145. Br J Anaesth. 2016. PMID: 27199335 No abstract available.
-
Most of the time, P is an unreliable marker, so we need no exact cut-off.Br J Anaesth. 2016 Jun;116(6):894. doi: 10.1093/bja/aew146. Br J Anaesth. 2016. PMID: 27199336 No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
