Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2015 Jun;24(136):283-98.
doi: 10.1183/16000617.00009014.

Clinically relevant subgroups in COPD and asthma

Affiliations
Review

Clinically relevant subgroups in COPD and asthma

Alice M Turner et al. Eur Respir Rev. 2015 Jun.

Abstract

As knowledge of airways disease has grown, it has become apparent that neither chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) nor asthma is a simple, easily defined disease. In the past, treatment options for both diseases were limited; thus, there was less need to define subgroups. As treatment options have grown, so has our need to predict who will respond to new drugs. To date, identifying subgroups has been largely reported by detailed clinical characterisation or differences in pathobiology. These subgroups are commonly called "phenotypes"; however, the problem of defining what constitutes a phenotype, whether this should include comorbid diseases and how to handle changes over time has led to the term being used loosely. In this review, we describe subgroups of COPD and asthma patients whose clinical characteristics we believe have therapeutic or major prognostic implications specific to the lung, and whether these subgroups are constant over time. Finally, we will discuss whether the subgroups we describe are common to both asthma and COPD, and give some examples of how treatment might be tailored in patients where the subgroup is clear, but the label of asthma or COPD is not.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest: Disclosures can be found alongside the online version of this article at err.ersjournals.com

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease subgroups without clear treatment implications. The figure shows the subgroups with clear prognostic implications for patients that are clinically relevant, but where therapeutic strategies are as yet unclear. The directions of the arrows indicate the probable direction of the association, e.g. patients with more frequent exacerbations are less likely to survive. The direction of association of bacterial colonisation and bronchiectasis is not clear; thus, a bidirectional arrow is shown.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Schematic diagram of the shared subgroups between asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The figure shows phenotypes that are recognised in both conditions. The placement/colour of the shapes indicates the degree to which they are recognised in asthma and COPD. ABPA: allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis.

References

    1. Lotvall J, Akdis CA, Bacharier LB, et al. . Asthma endotypes: a new approach to classification of disease entities within the asthma syndrome. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2011; 127: 355–360. - PubMed
    1. Han MK, Agusti A, Calverley PM, et al. . Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease phenotypes: the future of COPD. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2010; 182: 598–604. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Parr DG. Patient phenotyping and early disease detection in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Proc Am Thorac Soc 2011; 8: 338–349. - PubMed
    1. Wedzicha JA, Rabe KF, Martinez FJ, et al. . Efficacy of roflumilast in the COPD frequent exacerbator phenotype. Chest 2013; 143: 1302–1311. - PubMed
    1. Kerwin E, Hébert J, Gallagher N, et al. . Efficacy and safety of NVA237 versus placebo and tiotropium in patients with COPD: the GLOW2 study. Eur Respir J 2012; 40: 1106–1114. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types