Imposing genetic diversity
- PMID: 26030484
- DOI: 10.1080/15265161.2015.1028658
Imposing genetic diversity
Abstract
The idea that a world in which everyone was born "perfect" would be a world in which something valuable was missing often comes up in debates about the ethics of technologies of prenatal testing and preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD). This thought plays an important role in the "disability critique" of prenatal testing. However, the idea that human genetic variation is an important good with significant benefits for society at large is also embraced by a wide range of figures writing in the bioethics literature, including some who are notoriously hostile to the idea that we should not select against disability. By developing a number of thought experiments wherein we are to contemplate increasing genetic diversity from a lower baseline in order to secure this value, I argue that this powerful intuition is more problematic than is generally recognized, especially where the price of diversity is the well-being of particular individuals.
Keywords: PGD; disability; diversity; ethics; human enhancement; prenatal testing.
Comment in
-
Ruffling a few feathers.Am J Bioeth. 2015;15(6):1. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2015.1049919. Am J Bioeth. 2015. PMID: 26030483 No abstract available.
-
Disability, diversity, and preference for the status quo: bias or justifiable preference?Am J Bioeth. 2015;15(6):11-2. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2015.1028676. Am J Bioeth. 2015. PMID: 26030485 No abstract available.
-
Human biodiversity conservation: a consensual ethical principle.Am J Bioeth. 2015;15(6):13-5. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2015.1028663. Am J Bioeth. 2015. PMID: 26030486 No abstract available.
-
Procreative beneficence, diversity, intersubjectivity, and imprecision.Am J Bioeth. 2015;15(6):16-8. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2015.1028678. Am J Bioeth. 2015. PMID: 26030487 No abstract available.
-
Genetic diversity as a value: imposing fairness.Am J Bioeth. 2015;15(6):18-20. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2015.1028673. Am J Bioeth. 2015. PMID: 26030488 No abstract available.
-
Is disability conservationism rooted in status quo bias?Am J Bioeth. 2015;15(6):20-2. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2015.1028671. Am J Bioeth. 2015. PMID: 26030489 No abstract available.
-
Mitochondrial diversity and the reversal test.Am J Bioeth. 2015;15(6):23-4. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2015.1028669. Am J Bioeth. 2015. PMID: 26030490 No abstract available.
-
Reproductive genetic testing and human genetic variation in the era of genomic medicine.Am J Bioeth. 2015;15(6):25-6. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2015.1028661. Am J Bioeth. 2015. PMID: 26030491 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Imposing genetic diversity: an imposition on reproductive freedom.Am J Bioeth. 2015;15(6):27-8. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2015.1028662. Am J Bioeth. 2015. PMID: 26030492 No abstract available.
-
The Disvalue of Genetic Diversity, or: How (Not) to Treat a Sandelian Ethos on Steroids.Am J Bioeth. 2015;15(6):29-32. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2015.1028675. Am J Bioeth. 2015. PMID: 26030493 No abstract available.
-
Genetic technology to prevent disabilities: how popular culture informs our understanding of the use of genetics to define and prevent undesirable traits.Am J Bioeth. 2015;15(6):32-4. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2015.1028665. Am J Bioeth. 2015. PMID: 26030494 No abstract available.
-
The diversity of genetic perfection.Am J Bioeth. 2015;15(6):34-6. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2015.1028664. Am J Bioeth. 2015. PMID: 26030495 No abstract available.
-
Promoting individual well-being, increasing social welfare, and securing genetic diversity simultaneously: it is a matter of degree.Am J Bioeth. 2015;15(6):36-7. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2015.1028660. Am J Bioeth. 2015. PMID: 26030496 No abstract available.
-
Valuable and valueless diversity.Am J Bioeth. 2015;15(6):38-9. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2015.1028674. Am J Bioeth. 2015. PMID: 26030497 No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous