Safety of intra-arterial treatment in acute ischaemic stroke patients on oral anticoagulants. A cohort study and systematic review

Abstract

Background and purpose: An elevated international normalized ratio (INR) of >1.7 is a contraindication for the use of intravenous thrombolytics in acute ischaemic stroke. Local intra-arterial therapy (IAT) is considered a safe alternative. The safety and outcome of IAT were investigated in patients with acute ischaemic stroke using oral anticoagulants (OACs).

Methods: Data were obtained from a large national Dutch database on IAT in acute stroke patients. Patients were categorized according to the INR: >1.7 and ≤1.7. Primary outcome was symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH), defined as deterioration in the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score of ≥4 and ICH on brain imaging. Secondary outcomes were clinical outcome at discharge and 3 months. Occurrence of outcomes was compared with risk ratios and corresponding 95% confidence intervals. Further, a systematic review and meta-analysis on sICH risk in acute stroke patients on OACs treated with IAT was performed.

Results: Four hundred and fifty-six patients were included. Eighteen patients had an INR > 1.7 with a median INR of 2.4 (range 1.8-4.1). One patient (6%) in the INR > 1.7 group developed a sICH compared with 53 patients (12%) in the INR ≤ 1.7 group (risk ratio 0.49, 95% confidence interval 0.07-3.13). Clinical outcomes did not differ between the two groups. Our meta-analysis showed a first week sICH risk of 8.1% (95% confidence interval 3.9%-17.1%) in stroke patients with elevated INR treated with IAT.

Conclusion: The use of OACs, leading to an INR > 1.7, did not seem to increase the risk of an sICH in patients with an acute stroke treated with IAT.

Keywords: internationalized normalized ratio; intra-arterial treatment; meta-analysis; oral anticoagulants; thrombectomy.