Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Jun;63(6):1187-91.
doi: 10.1111/jgs.13453. Epub 2015 Jun 1.

How Should Disability Be Measured in Older Adults? An Analysis from the Boston Rehabilitative Impairment Study of the Elderly

Marla K Beauchamp  1   2   3 , Jonathan F Bean  1   2 , Rachel E Ward  1   2   3 , Laura A Kurlinski  2 , Nancy K Latham  3 , Alan M Jette  3
Affiliations

How Should Disability Be Measured in Older Adults? An Analysis from the Boston Rehabilitative Impairment Study of the Elderly

Marla K Beauchamp et al. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2015 Jun.

Abstract

Objectives: To determine and compare the predictive validity and responsiveness of the Late-Life Function and Disability Instrument (LLFDI) frequency and limitation dimensions in assessing two critical dimensions of disability: frequency of and limitations in performance of major life roles.

Design: Secondary analysis of 2-year follow-up data from the Boston Rehabilitative Impairment Study of the Elderly.

Setting: Primary care.

Participants: Community-dwelling older adults (≥65) (n = 430) at risk of mobility decline.

Measurements: The LLFDI frequency and limitation dimensions, self-rated health, hospitalizations, and emergency department (ED) visits over 2 years. Responsiveness measures included effect size (ES) estimates and minimal detectable change (MDC) scores.

Results: The LLFDI frequency dimension predicted low self-rated health (odds ratio (OR) = 0.51, P < .001), hospitalizations (OR = 0.68, P < .001), and ED visits (OR = 0.73, P = .003) over 2 years, whereas the limitation dimension did not. The absolute ES was 0.63 for the frequency dimension and 0.81 for the limitation dimension. The proportion of subjects with a decline greater than or equal to the MDC was 10.6% for the frequency dimension and 14.2% for the limitation dimension. For participants who improved greater than or equal to the MDC, the proportion was 1.7% for the frequency dimension and 15.3% for the limitation dimension.

Conclusion: Frequency of participation in major life roles was a better predictor of adverse outcomes than perceived limitations, although limitations appeared to be more responsive to meaningful change. These results can be used to guide the selection of the most appropriate metric for measuring disability in geriatric research.

Keywords: community-dwelling older adults; disability; minimal detectable change; responsiveness; validity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Comparison of percentages of participants demonstrating a decline (1A) or improvement (1B) ≥ the minimal detectable change (MDC90) over 2 years of follow-up on the Late-Life Function and Disability Instrument frequency and limitation dimensions and their subscales. For example, as shown in Figure 1B, 2% of participants improved ≥ the MDC90 of 7.4 points for the frequency dimension, compared to 15% of participants that improved ≥ the MDC90 of 11.6 points for the limitation dimension.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Haley SM, Jette AM, Coster WJ, et al. Late Life Function and Disability Instrument: II. Development and evaluation of the function component. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2002;57:M217–222. - PubMed
    1. Jette AM, Haley SM, Coster WJ, et al. Late life function and disability instrument: I. Development and evaluation of the disability component. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2002;57:M209–216. - PubMed
    1. Nagi S. Disability concepts revisited: implications for prevention. In: Pope A, Tarlov A, editors. Disability in America: Toward a National Agenda for Prevention. National Academy Press; Washington, DC: 1991. pp. 309–327.
    1. World Health Organization . International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. WHO; ICF. Geneva: 2001.
    1. Beauchamp MK, Schmidt CT, Pedersen MM, et al. Psychometric properties of the Late-Life Function and Disability Instrument: a systematic review. BMC Geriatr. 2014;14:12. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types