Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Jun 1;5(6):e007206.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-007206.

Disclosure of researcher allegiance in meta-analyses and randomised controlled trials of psychotherapy: a systematic appraisal

Elena Dragioti  1 , Ioannis Dimoliatis  1 , Evangelos Evangelou  2
Affiliations

Disclosure of researcher allegiance in meta-analyses and randomised controlled trials of psychotherapy: a systematic appraisal

Elena Dragioti et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Objective: Psychotherapy research may suffer from factors such as a researcher's own therapy allegiance. The aim of this study was to evaluate if researcher allegiance (RA) was reported in meta-analyses and randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of psychotherapeutic treatments.

Design: Systematic approach using meta-analyses of different types of psychotherapies.

Data sources: Medline, PsycINFO and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.

Methods: We evaluated meta-analyses of RCTs regarding various types of psychotherapies. Meta-analyses were eligible if they included at least one RCT with RA and they were published in journals in Medline, PsycINFO and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews with an impact factor larger than 5.

Results: We identified 146 eligible meta-analyses that synthesised data from a total of 1198 unique RCTs. Only 25 of the meta-analyses (17.2%) reported allegiance and only 6 (4.1%) used a proper method to control its effect. Of the 1198 eligible primary RCTs, 793 (66.3%) were allegiant. Authors in 25 of these 793 RCTs (3.2%) reported their allegiance while only one study (0.2%) controlled for its effect.

Conclusions: The vast majority among a group of published meta-analyses and RCTs of psychotherapeutic treatments seldom reported and evaluated the allegiance effect. The results of the present study highlight a major lack of this information in meta-analyses and their included studies, though meta-analyses perform slightly better than RCTs. Stringent guidelines should be adopted by journals in order to improve reporting and attenuate possible effects of RA in future research.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Munder T, Gerger H, Trelle S et al. . Testing the allegiance bias hypothesis: a meta-analysis. Psychother Res 2011;21:670–84. 10.1080/10503307.2011.602752 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wampold BE, Budge SL, Laska KM et al. . Evidence-based treatments for depression and anxiety versus treatment-as-usual: a meta-analysis of direct comparisons. Clin Psychol Rev 2011;31:1304–12. 10.1016/j.cpr.2011.07.012 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Leykin Y, DeRubeis RJ. Allegiance in psychotherapy outcome research: separating association from bias. Clin Psychol Sci Pr 2009;16:54–65. 10.1111/j.1468-2850.2009.01143.x - DOI
    1. Imel ZE, Wampold BE, Miller SD et al. . Distinctions without a difference: direct comparisons of psychotherapies for alcohol use disorders. Psychol Addict Behav 2008;22:533–43. 10.1037/a0013171 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Weisz JR, Jensen-Doss A, Hawley KM. Evidence-based youth psychotherapies versus usual clinical care: a meta-analysis of direct comparisons. Am Psychol 2006;61:671–89. 10.1037/0003-066X.61.7.671 - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms