Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Feb;17(2):177-83.
doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jev131. Epub 2015 Jun 1.

Apical traction: a novel visual echocardiographic parameter to predict survival in patients with pulmonary hypertension

Affiliations

Apical traction: a novel visual echocardiographic parameter to predict survival in patients with pulmonary hypertension

Serkan Unlu et al. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016 Feb.

Abstract

Aims: In some pulmonary hypertension (PH) patients, we noted a motion pattern where the right ventricular (RV) apex is pulled towards to left ventricle (LV) during systole, caused by traction from the LV ('apical traction', AT). Herein, we characterize patients with AT to investigate its prognostic significance.

Methods and results: Echocardiograms of 62 pre-capillary PH patients (42 females, age 61 ± 15 years) were retrospectively analysed. The presence of AT was assessed visually and confirmed by speckle-tracking analysis. Fractional area change (FAC), tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE), RV free-wall longitudinal strain (LS) as well as LV function were measured. A primary end point of death or heart/lung transplantation was set. AT was observed in 31 patients. They had worse functional capacity, lower TAPSE (1.3 ± 0.2 vs. 1.9 ± 0.4, P ≤ 0.001) and FAC (20.3 ± 6.1 vs. 33 ± 7.1%, P ≤ 0.001), worse RV free-wall LS (-12.4 ± 3.4 vs. -20.8 ± 4.9%, P < 0.001), and higher systolic pulmonary arterial pressure (92 ± 15 vs. 75 ± 23, P < 0.001). LV function was similar in both groups. The primary end point occurred in 16 patients with and 8 without AT. AT was an independent predictor of the outcome (HR: 14.826, 95% CI: 1.696-129.642, P = 0.015).

Conclusion: AT occurs in RVs with impaired systolic function in PH patients. It may serve as a new, easily to assess visual parameter to predict the outcome in these patients. Its prognostic importance needs to be validated by prospective studies.

Keywords: apical traction; pulmonary hypertension; right ventricular function; speckle-tracking echocardiography; survival.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Schematic of the mechanism of apical traction as it can be observed in the apical four-chamber view. Impaired contraction of the RV and traction from the normally contracting LV results in abnormal motion of the cardiac apex towards the left (blue arrows). Grey, diastole; red, systole.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Principle of the calculation of apical traction. (A) To estimate the traction of the apex (AT4CV) perpendicular to the longitudinal axis of the heart, two local displacement curves (dxL, dxR) (B) are obtained from both sides of the apex, e.g. by means of speckle tracking. (C) Then, the left-sided displacement curve (dxL) is inverted, which allows averaging. (D) Apical traction is then measured as displacement of the apex (dxaveraged) during systole, i.e. between mitral valve closure (MVC) and aortic valve closure (AVC).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Scatter plot of the apical traction amplitude in relation to the difference between RV and LV function as measured by RV free-wall GLS and LV GLS. The regression analysis revealed a significant correlation, suggesting a relation between AT and the imbalance in RV and LV function.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Kaplan–Meier survival curves for freedom from death or heart–lung transplant (HLTx) of patients with (AT) and without (Non-AT) apical traction.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Probability of freedom from death or heart–lung transplant, with the effect of co-variables from multivariable Cox regression analysis (Table 4). AT, patients with apical traction; Non-AT, patients without apical traction.

References

    1. McLaughlin VV, Archer SL, Badesch DB, Barst RJ, Farber HW, Lindner JR, et al. ACCF/AHA 2009 expert consensus document on pulmonary hypertension a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Expert Consensus Documents and the American Heart Association developed in collaboration with the American College of Chest Physicians; American Thoracic Society, Inc.; and the Pulmonary Hypertension Association. J Am Coll Cardiol 2009;53:1573–619. - PubMed
    1. Farber HW, Loscalzo J. Pulmonary arterial hypertension. N Engl J Med 2004;35:1655–65. - PubMed
    1. McLaughlin VV, Presberg KW, Doyle RL, Abman SH, McCrory DC, Fortin T, et al. American College of Chest Physicians.American College of Chest Physicians. Prognosis of pulmonary arterial hypertension: ACCP evidence-based clinical practice guidelines. Chest 2004;126(1 Suppl):78–92. - PubMed
    1. Humbert M, Sitbon O, Chaouat A, Bertocchi M, Habib G, Gressin V, et al. Survival in patients with idiopathic, familial, and anorexigen-associated pulmonary arterial hypertension in the modern management era. Circulation 2010;122:156–63. - PubMed
    1. Ghio S, Klersy C, Magrini G, D'Armini AM, Scelsi L, Raineri C, et al. Prognostic relevance of the echocardiographic assessment of right ventricular function in patients with idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension. Int J Cardiol 2010;140:272–8. - PubMed

Publication types