Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2015 Jul;136(1):97-106.
doi: 10.1542/peds.2014-2955. Epub 2015 Jun 1.

Medical-Legal Strategies to Improve Infant Health Care: A Randomized Trial

Robert Sege  1 , Genevieve Preer  2 , Samantha J Morton  3 , Howard Cabral  4 , Oluwatomisin Morakinyo  2 , Vonne Lee  2 , Catarina Abreu  2 , Edward De Vos  5 , Margot Kaplan-Sanoff  2
Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Medical-Legal Strategies to Improve Infant Health Care: A Randomized Trial

Robert Sege et al. Pediatrics. 2015 Jul.

Abstract

Background: Changes in health care delivery create opportunities to improve systems to better meet the needs of low-income families while achieving quality benchmarks.

Methods: Families of healthy newborns receiving primary care at a single large urban safety-net hospital participated. Intervention families were randomly assigned a family specialist who provided support until the 6-month routine health care visit. The Developmental Understanding and Legal Collaboration for Everyone (DULCE) intervention is based on the Strengthening Families approach and incorporated components of the Healthy Steps and Medical-Legal Partnership models. Medical record reviews determined use of preventive and emergency care. Surveys conducted at baseline, postintervention (6 months), and follow-up (12 months) were used to determine hardship and attainment of concrete supports.

Results: Three hundred thirty families participated in the study. At baseline, 73% of families reported economic hardships. Intervention parents had an average of 14 contacts with the family specialist, and 5 hours of total contact time. Intervention infants were more likely to have completed their 6-month immunization schedule by age 7 months (77% vs 63%, P < .005) and by 8 months (88% vs 77%, P < .01). Intervention infants were more likely to have 5 or more routine preventive care visits by age 1 year (78% vs 67%, P < .01) and were less likely to have visited the emergency department by age 6 months (37% vs 49.7%, P < .03). The DULCE intervention accelerated access to concrete resources (P = .029).

Conclusions: Assignment to the Project DULCE intervention led to improvements in preventive health care delivery and utilization and accelerated access to concrete supports among low-income families.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01343940.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE: The authors have indicated they have no financial relationships relevant to this article to disclose.

Figures

FIGURE 1. Theoretical framework. Adapted from Barnett,17 DULCE leveraged support from MLP | Boston to address upstream factors: food, housing, and utilities hardship, and to identify and support other family legal needs. This intervention was designed to reduce overall family economic pressure and the resultant downstream results.
FIGURE 1
Theoretical framework. Adapted from Barnett, DULCE leveraged support from MLP | Boston to address upstream factors: food, housing, and utilities hardship, and to identify and support other family legal needs. This intervention was designed to reduce overall family economic pressure and the resultant downstream results.
FIGURE 2. DULCE Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials diagram showing flow of participants from initial assessment through data analysis. Please see text for detailed explanation.
FIGURE 2
DULCE Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials diagram showing flow of participants from initial assessment through data analysis. Please see text for detailed explanation.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Racine AD, Long TF, Helm ME, et al; Committee on Child Health Financing. Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP): accomplishments, challenges, and policy recommendations. Pediatrics. 2014;133(3). Available at: www.pediatrics.org/cgi/content/full/133/3/e784 - PubMed
    1. Mangione-Smith R , Schiff J , Dougherty D . Identifying children’s health care quality measures for Medicaid and CHIP: an evidence-informed, publicly transparent expert process. Acad Pediatr. 2011;11(suppl 3):S11–S21 - PubMed
    1. Urban Institute, Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. Gains for children: increased participation in Medicaid and CHIP in 2009. Available at: www.rwjf.org/content/dam/farm/reports/reports/2011/rwjf70806. Published 2011. Accessed March 25, 2014
    1. Chien AT , Song Z , Chernew ME , et al. . Two-year impact of the alternative quality contract on pediatric health care quality and spending. Pediatrics. 2014;133(1):96–104 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Conroy K , Sandel M , Zuckerman B . Poverty grown up: how childhood socioeconomic status impacts adult health. J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2010;31(2):154–160 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Associated data