Optimal foraging theory and niche-construction theory do not stand in opposition
- PMID: 26034293
- PMCID: PMC4475954
- DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1507637112
Optimal foraging theory and niche-construction theory do not stand in opposition
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Comment in
-
Reply to Mohlenhoff et al.: Human behavioral ecology needs a rethink that niche-construction theory can provide.Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Jun 16;112(24):E3094. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1508096112. Epub 2015 Jun 1. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015. PMID: 26034292 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Comment on
-
Core questions in domestication research.Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Mar 17;112(11):3191-8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1501711112. Epub 2015 Feb 20. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015. PMID: 25713127 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Codding B-F, Bird DW. Behavioral ecology and the future of archaeological science. J Arch Sci. 2015;56:9–20.
-
- Smith B. 2015. A comparison of niche construction theory and diet breadth models as explanatory frameworks for the initial domestication of plants and animals. J Arch Res, 10.1007/s10814-015-9081-4.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
