Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Jun;10(2):285-91.
doi: 10.1007/s11552-014-9717-8.

A retrospective comparison of the management of recalcitrant lateral elbow tendinosis: platelet-rich plasma injections versus surgery

Ronald D Ford  1 , William P Schmitt  1 , Kyle Lineberry  2 , Paul Luce  1
Affiliations

A retrospective comparison of the management of recalcitrant lateral elbow tendinosis: platelet-rich plasma injections versus surgery

Ronald D Ford et al. Hand (N Y). 2015 Jun.

Abstract

Background: The aim of this study is to compare the outcomes of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injections to surgical release and decortication for lateral elbow tendinosis within a similar patient population.

Methods: A retrospective chart review was performed on two groups of patients, receiving either PRP injections (n = 28) or surgery (n = 50). Patient demographics, clinical presentation, pain score, worker's compensation status, and previous steroid injections were recorded. Primary outcomes included pain and symptom improvement, range of motion, return to work, and postoperative complications.

Results: Demographics, duration of symptoms, and exam findings were similar between the PRP and surgical patients. There was no significant difference in pain and symptom improvement. Pain improvement was reported in 89.3 % of PRP patients and 84 % of surgical patients, with a reported percent reduction in pain of 61.1 and 55 %, respectively. Symptoms other than pain improved in 85.7 and 88 % of the PRP and surgical patients, respectively. Tenderness to palpation at the lateral epicondyle (64.3 % PRP, 44 % surgical), pain with resisted wrist extension (35.7 % PRP, 30 % surgical), or residual symptoms other than pain (14.3 % PRP, 10 % surgical) were not significantly different between groups at last follow-up. Eighty-two percent of patients in both the PRP and surgical groups returned to work. No complications were reported. Mean follow-up was 315 vs. 352 days for the PRP and surgical groups, respectively.

Conclusions: Similar outcomes in pain improvement and return to work may be achievable with either PRP injections or surgery in recalcitrant lateral elbow tendinosis. PRP injections may be a reasonable alternative for patients apprehensive to proceed with surgery or poor surgical candidates.

Keywords: Epicondylitis; Injection; Plasma; Platelet; Surgery.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Surgical release and decortication. The extensor origin V-shaped releasing incision exposes the lateral epicondyle (left). Decortication was performed to bleeding bone (right)
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Johnson GW, Cadwallader K, Scheffel SB, Epperly TD. Treatment of lateral epicondylitis. Am Fam Physician. 2007;76(6):843–848. - PubMed
    1. Nirschl RP, Pettrone FA. The surgical treatment of lateral epicondylitis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1979;61(6A):832–839. - PubMed
    1. Scher DL, Wolf JM, Owens BD. Lateral epicondylitis. Orthopedics. 2009;32(4):276–282. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20090401-06. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Struijs PA, Kerkhoffs GM, Assendelft WJ, et al. Conservative treatment of lateral epicondylitis: brace versus physical therapy or a combination of both—a randomized clinical trial. Am J Sports Med. 2004;32(2):462–469. doi: 10.1177/0095399703258714. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Smidt N, van der Windt DA, Assendelft WJ, et al. Corticosteroid injections, physiotherapy, or a wait-and-see policy for lateral epicondylitis: a randomized controlled trial. Lancet. 2002;359(37):657–662. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)07811-X. - DOI - PubMed