Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2015 Apr;8(4):337-50.
doi: 10.1242/dmm.018036. Epub 2015 Apr 1.

Genetically modified T cells in cancer therapy: opportunities and challenges

Affiliations
Review

Genetically modified T cells in cancer therapy: opportunities and challenges

Michaela Sharpe et al. Dis Model Mech. 2015 Apr.

Abstract

Tumours use many strategies to evade the host immune response, including downregulation or weak immunogenicity of target antigens and creation of an immune-suppressive tumour environment. T cells play a key role in cell-mediated immunity and, recently, strategies to genetically modify T cells either through altering the specificity of the T cell receptor (TCR) or through introducing antibody-like recognition in chimeric antigen receptors (CARs) have made substantial advances. The potential of these approaches has been demonstrated in particular by the successful use of genetically modified T cells to treat B cell haematological malignancies in clinical trials. This clinical success is reflected in the growing number of strategic partnerships in this area that have attracted a high level of investment and involve large pharmaceutical organisations. Although our understanding of the factors that influence the safety and efficacy of these therapies has increased, challenges for bringing genetically modified T-cell immunotherapy to many patients with different tumour types remain. These challenges range from the selection of antigen targets and dealing with regulatory and safety issues to successfully navigating the routes to commercial development. However, the encouraging clinical data, the progress in the scientific understanding of tumour immunology and the improvements in the manufacture of cell products are all advancing the clinical translation of these important cellular immunotherapies.

Keywords: CAR; Clinical trial; Efficacy; Gene modification; Immunotherapies; Manufacturing; Oncology; Regulation; Safety; T cell; TCR.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Cells of the innate and adaptive immune systems. The innate immune system provides an immediate response to foreign targets, with responses typically within minutes to hours. It consists of a number of soluble factors and proteins as well as a diverse set of cells, including granulocytes, macrophages, dendritic cells and natural killer cells. The second branch of the immune system is the adaptive or acquired immune system, which provides specific, long-lasting immune responses. The adaptive and innate immune systems are linked; for example dendritic cells are important adaptive immune system cell activators. The adaptive immune system consists of antibodies, B cells, and CD4+ and CD8+ T cells, and these enable a highly specific response against a particular target. Natural killer T cells and γδ T cells are cytotoxic lymphocytes that overlap both innate and adaptive immunity. Cells from both arms of the immune system are in development as potential cellular immunotherapies.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
Structure and function of the TCR. (A) The T cell receptor (TCR), found on the surface of T cells, is responsible for antigen recognition. It consists of two chains: the alpha (α) and beta (β) chains. Both chains have a constant region (c) and a variable region (v), and it is the variable region that determines antigen specificity. The TCR is associated with the CD3 complex, which comprises three transmembrane signalling molecules (CD3ζζ, CD3δε and CD3γε). (B) A TCR will interact with an antigen on a target cell when the target peptide sequence is presented by the appropriate major histocompatibility complex (MHC-1 for cytotoxic T cells). Efficient T-cell activation also requires the simultaneous binding of the T cell co-receptor (CD8 for cytotoxic T cells). ss, disulphide bridge.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.
Genetically modified TCRs for cancer immunotherapy. (A) T-cell response can be manipulated and redirected against cancer, with improved specificity and affinity for tumour antigens, via genetic engineering of the endogenous TCR. (B) Genetically modified TCR: gene sequences are transferred to the T cell to encode new TCR α and β chains with different peptide specificity. In addition, there can also be transmembrane changes (red bars). To minimise interchain mispairing with the endogenous TCR, modifications such as the addition of a disulphide bridge (ss) are made. (C) Alternatively, a fusion receptor can be generated, a chimeric antigen receptor (CAR). Typically, these consist of three parts: a recognition sequence [represented here by an antibody-derived single-chain variable fragment (scFv)], a transmembrane element and an intracellular bespoke signalling domain (CD3ζ), which also contains co-stimulatory molecules, such as CD28 and tumour necrosis factor receptors (TNFr) such as OX-40.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 4.
TCR α- and β-chain pairing and mispairing. A genetically modified TCR T cell expresses both the endogenous and transduced α/β TCR chains. There are four possible TCR chain combinations: (1) an endogenous α and β chain TCR; (2) a TCR generated from the transduced exogenous α and β TCR sequences; and (3 and 4) hybrid (mispaired) TCRs formed from a combination of endogenous and exogenous α and β chains. The reactivity of the hybrid TCRs is unknown and is a potential source of self-reactive toxicities.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 5.
CD8+ T-cell subsets. There are a number of different CD8+ T-cell subsets. Naïve, T stem cell (TSCM) and T central memory (TCM) cells circulate and migrate to lymphoid tissue, whereas effector memory T cells (TEM) and effector T cells (TEFF) have the capacity to traffic to peripheral tissues. There are a number of models for the differentiation of CD8+ T cells (Joshi and Kaech, 2008). One model is the linear model for differentiation of CD8+ T cells, which proposes that, following activation of a naïve T cell, there is a progressive differentiation through three major circulating subsets of T cells (TSCM, TCM and TEM), with TEFF representing the terminally differentiated T cells. Targeting different T-cell subsets could increase efficacy and persistence of genetically modified T-cell therapies.
Fig. 6.
Fig. 6.
Manufacturing and delivery pipeline of genetically modified T-cell therapies. (i) T cells are harvested from a patient and sent to a good manufacturing practices (GMP) manufacturing facility, which might not be local to the treating hospital. Cells that pass acceptance criteria are genetically engineered (ii) with either a new T cell receptor (TCR) or a receptor based on a recognition sequence of an antibody [chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)], combined with T-cell co-stimulatory sequences. After a brief period of in vitro expansion and passing of product-specific release criteria (iii), the T-cell product must be returned to the correct patient (iv). The patient can undergo conditioning regimens prior to infusion of the genetically modified T-cell product (v). The complexity of this multi-step process in the manufacture and delivery of T-cell immunotherapies poses several economic and regulatory issues, which represent a challenge for the improvement and accessibility of such therapies. PBMC, peripheral blood mononuclear cell.

References

    1. Bendle G. M., Linnemann C., Hooijkaas A. I., Bies L., de Witte M. A., Jorritsma A., Kaiser A. D., Pouw N., Debets R., Kieback E., et al. (2010). Lethal graft-versus-host disease in mouse models of T cell receptor gene therapy. Nat. Med. 16, 565–570, 1p, 570. - PubMed
    1. Berger C., Jensen M. C., Lansdorp P. M., Gough M., Elliott C., Riddell S. R. (2008). Adoptive transfer of effector CD8+ T cells derived from central memory cells establishes persistent T cell memory in primates. J. Clin. Invest. 118, 294–305. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Besser M. J., Shapira-Frommer R., Itzhaki O., Treves A. J., Zippel D. B., Levy D., Kubi A., Shoshani N., Zikich D., Ohayon Y., et al. (2013). Adoptive transfer of tumour infiltrating lymphocytes in metastatic melanoma patients: intent-to-treat analysis and efficacy after failure to prior immunotherapies. Clin. Cancer Res. 19, 4792–4800. - PubMed
    1. Blankenstein T., Coulie P. G., Gilboa E., Jaffee E. M. (2012). The determinants of tumour immunogenicity. Nat. Rev. Cancer 12, 307–313. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Brentjens R., Yeh R., Bernal Y., Riviere I., Sadelain M. (2010). Treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia with genetically targeted autologous T cells: case report of an unforeseen adverse event in a phase I clinical trial. Mol. Ther. 18, 666–668. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Substances