Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2015 Jun 3:41:42.
doi: 10.1186/s13052-015-0141-7.

Flavor, relative palatability and components of cow's milk hydrolysed formulas and amino acid-based formula

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Flavor, relative palatability and components of cow's milk hydrolysed formulas and amino acid-based formula

Michele Miraglia Del Giudice et al. Ital J Pediatr. .

Abstract

Background: Both extensively hydrolysed formulas (eHF) and amino acid-based formula (AAFs) have been demonstrated effective for the treatment of CMA. However, in clinical practice, parents complain that hydrolysates are rejected by children due to their bad taste. Flavor of hydrolysed formulas has been poorly investigated although it affects the acceptance of milk over all the other attributes. The aim of the present study was to understand the factors underlying the unpleasant flavor of hydrolysed 25 formulas and amino acid-based formula.

Subjects and methods: One hundred and fifty trained panelists performed a randomized-double-blind test with different milks. The smell, texture, taste and aftertaste of each formula were evaluated on a scale ranging from -2 (worst) to 2 (best).

Results: Formulas showed significant difference, as compared to cow's milk, in smell, texture, taste and aftertaste. Overall, whey eHFs were judged of better palatability than casein eHF and the AAFs (p < 0.05). Whey eHF showed significant differences among them for sensory attributes, especially for taste and aftertaste.

Conclusions: These results suggest that a broad range of flavor exists among the hydrolysed formulas. Further studies, adequately designed to investigate the relationship between milks' flavor and nutrient profile of hydrolysed formulas are warranted.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Stacked bar chart of the overall judgement of palatability of the formulas.

References

    1. Host A. Frequency of cow’s milk allergy in childhood. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2002;89((6) Suppl 1):33–7. doi: 10.1016/S1081-1206(10)62120-5. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wood RA. The natural history of food allergy. Pediatrics. 2003;111:1631–7. - PubMed
    1. Host A, Halken S, Jacobsen HP, Christensen AE, Herskind AM, Plesner K. Clinical course of cow’s milk protein allergy/intolerance and atopic diseases in childhood. Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2002;13(Suppl 15):23–8. doi: 10.1034/j.1399-3038.13.s.15.7.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Skripak JM, Matsui EC, Mudd K, Wood RA. The natural history of IgE-mediated cow’s milk allergy. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2007;120:1172–7. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2007.08.023. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Levy Y, Segal N, Gatry B, Danon YL. Lessons from the clinical course of IgE-mediated cow milk allergy in Israel. Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2007;18:589–93. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3038.2007.00562.x. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types