Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Dec;23(12):1601-6.
doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2015.111. Epub 2015 Jun 3.

Towards a European consensus for reporting incidental findings during clinical NGS testing

Affiliations

Towards a European consensus for reporting incidental findings during clinical NGS testing

Jayne Y Hehir-Kwa et al. Eur J Hum Genet. 2015 Dec.

Abstract

In 2013, the American College of Medical Genetics (ACMG) examined the issue of incidental findings in whole exome and whole genome sequencing, and introduced recommendations to search for, evaluate and report medically actionable variants in a set of 56 genes. At a debate held during the 2014 European Society for Human Genetics Conference (ESHG) in Milan, Italy, the first author of that paper presented this view in a debate session that did not end with a conclusive vote from the mainly European audience for or against reporting back actionable incidental findings. In this meeting report, we elaborate on the discussions held during a special meeting hosted at the ESHG in 2013 from posing the question 'How to reach a (European) consensus on reporting incidental findings and unclassified variants in diagnostic next generation sequencing'. We ask whether an European consensus exists on the reporting of incidental findings in genome diagnostics, and present a series of key issues that require discussion at both a national and European level in order to develop recommendations for handling incidental findings and unclassified variants in line with the legal and cultural particularities of individual European member states.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. de Ligt J, Willemsen MH, van Bon BW et al: Diagnostic exome sequencing in persons with severe intellectual disability. N Engl J Medicine 2012; 367: 1921–1929. - PubMed
    1. Rauch A, Wieczorek D, Graf E et al: Range of genetic mutations associated with severe non-syndromic sporadic intellectual disability: an exome sequencing study. Lancet 2012; 380: 1674–1682. - PubMed
    1. Yang Y, Muzny DM, Reid JG et al: Clinical whole-exome sequencing for the diagnosis of mendelian disorders. The N Engl J Medicine 2013; 369: 1502–1511. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Zemojtel T, Kohler S, Mackenroth L et al: Effective diagnosis of genetic disease by computational phenotype analysis of the disease-associated genome. Sci Tansl Med 2014; 6: 252ra123. - PMC - PubMed
    1. McGuire AL, Joffe S, Koenig BA et al: Point-counterpoint. Ethics and genomic incidental findings. Science (New York, NY) 2013; 340: 1047–1048. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources