Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2015 Jun;32(2):156-62.
doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1549446.

Radiation-related injuries and their management: an update

Affiliations
Review

Radiation-related injuries and their management: an update

Kevin Wunderle et al. Semin Intervent Radiol. 2015 Jun.

Abstract

Ionizing radiation (in the form of X-rays) is used for the majority of procedures in interventional radiology. This review article aimed at promoting safer use of this tool through a better understanding of radiation dose and radiation effects, and by providing guidance for setting up a quality assurance program. To this end, the authors describe different radiation descriptive quantities and their individual strengths and challenges, as well as the biologic effects of ionizing radiation, including patient-related effects such as tissue reactions (previously known as deterministic effects) and stochastic effects. In this article, the clinical presentation, immediate management, and clinical follow-up of these injuries are also discussed. Tissue reactions are important primarily from the patients' perspective, whereas stochastic effects are most relevant for pediatric patients and from an occupational viewpoint. The factors affecting the likelihood of skin reaction (the most common tissue reaction) are described, and how this condition should be managed is discussed. Setting up a robust quality assurance program around radiation dose is imperative for effective monitoring and reduction of radiation exposure to patients and operators. Recommendations for the pre-, peri-, and postprocedure periods are given, including recommendations for follow-up of high-dose cases. Special conditions such as pregnancy and radiation recall are also discussed.

Keywords: interventional radiology; occupational radiation exposure; quality assurance; radiation dose.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Radiochromic film (14 inches × 17 inches) from a fenestrated and branched endovascular repair showing the two-dimensional radiation dose distribution. Film darkness is correlative to increased radiation dose.

References

    1. Joiner M van der Kogel A, eds. Basic Clinical Radiobiology, 4th ed London: CRC Press; 200911–14.
    1. Hall E J, Giaccia A J. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2006. Radiobiology for the Radiologist, 6th ed; pp. 135–136.
    1. The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP publication 103. Ann ICRP. 2007;37(2-4):1–332. - PubMed
    1. Jones A K, Ensor J E, Pasciak A S. How accurately can the peak skin dose in fluoroscopy be determined using indirect dose metrics? Med Phys. 2014;41(7):71913. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Miller D L, Balter S, Schueler B A, Wagner L K, Strauss K J, Vañó E. Clinical radiation management for fluoroscopically guided interventional procedures. Radiology. 2010;257(2):321–332. - PubMed