Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Jun 3;10(6):e0129819.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0129819. eCollection 2015.

Neighborhood deprivation is strongly associated with participation in a population-based health check

Affiliations

Neighborhood deprivation is strongly associated with participation in a population-based health check

Anne Mette Bender et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Background: We sought to examine whether neighborhood deprivation is associated with participation in a large population-based health check. Such analyses will help answer the question whether health checks, which are designed to meet the needs of residents in deprived neighborhoods, may increase participation and prove to be more effective in preventing disease. In Europe, no study has previously looked at the association between neighborhood deprivation and participation in a population-based health check.

Methods: The study population comprised 12,768 persons invited for a health check including screening for ischemic heart disease and lifestyle counseling. The study population was randomly drawn from a population of 179,097 persons living in 73 neighborhoods in Denmark. Data on neighborhood deprivation (percentage with basic education, with low income and not in work) and individual socioeconomic position were retrieved from national administrative registers. Multilevel regression analyses with log links and binary distributions were conducted to obtain relative risks, intraclass correlation coefficients and proportional change in variance.

Results: Large differences between neighborhoods existed in both deprivation levels and neighborhood health check participation rate (mean 53%; range 35-84%). In multilevel analyses adjusted for age and sex, higher levels of all three indicators of neighborhood deprivation and a deprivation score were associated with lower participation in a dose-response fashion. Persons living in the most deprived neighborhoods had up to 37% decreased probability of participating compared to those living in the least deprived neighborhoods. Inclusion of individual socioeconomic position in the model attenuated the neighborhood deprivation coefficients, but all except for income deprivation remained statistically significant.

Conclusion: Neighborhood deprivation was associated with participation in a population-based health check in a dose-response manner, in which increasing neighborhood deprivation was associated with decreasing participation. This suggests the need to develop preventive health checks tailored to deprived neighborhoods.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Mean neighborhood participation rate by percent with basic education in the neighborhood (neighborhoods n = 73, persons n = 12,768).
Fig 2
Fig 2. Mean neighborhood participation rate by percent not in work in the neighborhood (neighborhoods n = 73, persons n = 12,768).
Fig 3
Fig 3. Mean neighborhood participation rate by percent with low income in the neighborhood (neighborhoods n = 73, persons n = 12,768).

References

    1. Galea S, Tracy M. Participation rates in epidemiologic studies. Ann Epidemiol. 2007;17: 643–653. 10.1016/j.annepidem.2007.03.013 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Artac M, Dalton ARH, Majeed A, Car J, Huckvale K, Millett C. Uptake of the NHS Health Check programme in an urban setting. Fam Pract. 2013;30: 426–435. 10.1093/fampra/cmt002 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bender AM, Jørgensen T, Helbech B, Linneberg A, Pisinger C. Socioeconomic position and participation in baseline and follow-up visits: the Inter99 study. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2012;21: 899–905. 10.1177/2047487312472076 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Dryden R, Williams B, McCowan C, Themessl-Huber M. What do we know about who does and does not attend general health checks? Findings from a narrative scoping review. BMC Public Health. 2012;12: 723 10.1186/1471-2458-12-723 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Osler M, Linneberg A, Glümer C, Jørgensen T. The cohorts at the Research Centre for Prevention and Health, formerly “The Glostrup Population Studies.” Int J Epidemiol. 2011;40: 602–610. 10.1093/ije/dyq041 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources