Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Oct;18(5):1610-20.
doi: 10.1111/hex.12150. Epub 2013 Oct 23.

Use of forecasted assessment of quality of life to validate time-trade-off utilities and a prostate cancer screening decision-analytic model

Scott B Cantor  1 , Ashish A Deshmukh  1 , Murray D Krahn  2 , Robert J Volk  3
Affiliations

Use of forecasted assessment of quality of life to validate time-trade-off utilities and a prostate cancer screening decision-analytic model

Scott B Cantor et al. Health Expect. 2015 Oct.

Abstract

Purpose: To determine whether the forecasted assessment of how someone would feel in a future health state can be predictive of utilities (e.g. as elicited by the time-trade-off method) and also predictive of optimal decisions as determined by a decision-analytic model.

Methods: We elicited time-trade-off utilities for prostate cancer treatment outcomes from 168 men. We also elicited forecasted assessments, that is, an informal, non-quantitative, descriptive evaluation, of impotence and incontinence from these men. We used multivariate regression analysis to explore the relationship between forecasted assessment and reluctance to trade length for improved quality of life, that is, the unwillingness to trade length of life for improved quality of life in the time-trade-off utility assessment and the relationship between the forecasted assessments and the optimal decision of whether to undergo screening for prostate cancer as determined from a previously published decision-analytic model.

Results: Importance of sexual function was strongly related to impotence utilities (P < 0.05). Based on the multivariate analysis, significant predictors for the utility of severe incontinence were family income, family history of prostate cancer, work status and attitude towards needing to wear an incontinence pad. However, no variables were statistically significant predictors for the utility of complete impotence. The importance of sexual functioning was a significant predictor of the optimal decision.

Conclusion: Anticipated difficulty adjusting to adverse health effects were highly related to preferences and could be used as a proxy measure of utility. Similarly, the importance of sexual functioning, a future preference, was highly related to the optimal decision, which validates our previously published decision-analytic model.

Keywords: decision making; decision support techniques; mass screening; prostate neoplasm; quality of life.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Moyer VA, U.S. Preventive Services Task Force . Screening for prostate cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Annals of Internal Medicine, 2012; 157: 120–134. - PubMed
    1. American Cancer Society . Cancer Facts and Figures. Atlanta, GA: American Cancer Society, 2013. Available at: http://www.cancer.org/acs/groups/content/@epidemiologysurveilance/docume..., accessed 11 October 2013.
    1. Goldberg JH, Schwartz A. Forecasting changes in preference over the life span: a qualitative study of African‐American men's prostate cancer decision making. Supportive Care in Cancer, 2009; 17: 69–74. - PubMed
    1. Saigal CS, Gornbein J, Reid K, Litwin MS. Stability of time trade‐off utilities for health states associated with the treatment of prostate cancer. Quality of Life Research, 2002; 11: 405–414. - PubMed
    1. Saigal CS, Gornbein J, Nease R, Litwin MS. Predictors of utilities for health states in early stage prostate cancer. Journal of Urology, 2001; 166: 942–946. - PubMed

Publication types