Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Jun 3;10(6):e0129863.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0129863. eCollection 2015.

Biased recognition of facial affect in patients with major depressive disorder reflects clinical state

Affiliations

Biased recognition of facial affect in patients with major depressive disorder reflects clinical state

Paula Münkler et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Cognitive theories of depression posit that perception is negatively biased in depressive disorder. Previous studies have provided empirical evidence for this notion, but left open the question whether the negative perceptual bias reflects a stable trait or the current depressive state. Here we investigated the stability of negatively biased perception over time. Emotion perception was examined in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) and healthy control participants in two experiments. In the first experiment subjective biases in the recognition of facial emotional expressions were assessed. Participants were presented with faces that were morphed between sad and neutral and happy expressions and had to decide whether the face was sad or happy. The second experiment assessed automatic emotion processing by measuring the potency of emotional faces to gain access to awareness using interocular suppression. A follow-up investigation using the same tests was performed three months later. In the emotion recognition task, patients with major depression showed a shift in the criterion for the differentiation between sad and happy faces: In comparison to healthy controls, patients with MDD required a greater intensity of the happy expression to recognize a face as happy. After three months, this negative perceptual bias was reduced in comparison to the control group. The reduction in negative perceptual bias correlated with the reduction of depressive symptoms. In contrast to previous work, we found no evidence for preferential access to awareness of sad vs. happy faces. Taken together, our results indicate that MDD-related perceptual biases in emotion recognition reflect the current clinical state rather than a stable depressive trait.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Examples of the morph steps for two face exemplars.
Numbers indicate proportion of happiness expressed by the face: 0 corresponds to 100% sad, 1 to 100% happy, and 0.5 to 100% neutral. The middle position (0.56) is a slightly happy expression of 12% (see text).
Fig 2
Fig 2. Negative perceptual bias in patients with MDD.
Patients with MDD recognized facial expression as happy if a higher proportion of happiness is expressed by the face compared to HC. MDD = major depressive disorder; HC = healthy controls (A): Example of a fitted logistic function to the behavioral responses for one representative participant. Intensity of the affective expression is displayed on the y-axis. Transition from sad to happy corresponds to values between 0 and 1 on the x-axis. 0 corresponds to the fully sad expression, 1 is attributed to a happy expression. A y-value of 1 corresponds to a classification of the face as happy in each trial and a y-value of 0 to the response ‘sad’ in each trial, 0.5 is assigned if a face is equally often classified as happy and sad. The x-value indicates the PSE of the curve corresponding to the criterion for the categorical shift. The categorical shift from sad to happy indicates the morphed facial expression that is equally often categorized as happy and sad. (B): Bar plot, displaying the mean PSE at T1 for both groups. *p = 0.025. Error bars denote within-subject standard errors of mean [53].
Fig 3
Fig 3. Perceptual bias is reduced in patients with MDD with diminished depressive symptoms.
MDD = major depressive disorder; HC = healthy controls. Bar plots depicting mean PSEs (A) and slopes (B) of the logistic functions for the two groups and two time points. A significant interaction of time and group was observed for the PSE, indicating the inflection point of the logistic functions (p < 0.001). For the slopes of the logistic functions, indicating the abruptness of the categorical shift from sad to happy, no main effects or interactions were found. *: interaction of time and group, p < 0.001. Error bars denote within-subject standard errors of mean [53].
Fig 4
Fig 4. Correlation between change of depressive symptoms and change of perceptual bias in patients with MDD.
For patients diagnosed with depression, the change in the degree of severity of depressive symptoms between the two time points of testing correlated positively with the change of the perceptual biases between the two sessions. The severity of depressive symptoms is indexed by BDI scores. The perceptual bias is indicated by the PSE of the individual logistic functions.
Fig 5
Fig 5. Suppression time modulation by sad and happy faces at T1.
Bar plots depict suppression time modulations for happy and sad facial expressions relative to neutral expressions for patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) and healthy participants (HC) at T1. Values > 1, represented by the dotted line, indicate longer suppression times in relation to neutral faces. No differences between emotions or groups were found. Error bars indicate within-subject standard-errors of the mean [53] MDD = major depressive disorder; HC = healthy controls.

References

    1. Beck AT. Cognitive Therapy and the Emotional Disorders. Penguin; 1979.
    1. Gollan JK, Pane H, McCloskey M, Coccaro EF. Identifying differences in biased affective information processing in major depression. Psychiatry Res. 2008;159: 18–24. 10.1016/j.psychres.2007.06.011 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gur RC, Erwin RJ, Gur RE, Zwil AS, Heimberg C, Kraemer HC. Facial emotion discrimination: II. Behavioral findings in depression. Psychiatry Res. 1992;42: 241–251. - PubMed
    1. Hale WW 3rd, Jansen JH, Bouhuys AL, van den Hoofdakker RH. The judgement of facial expressions by depressed patients, their partners and controls. J Affect Disord. 1998;47: 63–70. - PubMed
    1. Liu W, Huang J, Wang L, Gong Q, Chan RCK. Facial perception bias in patients with major depression. Psychiatry Res. 2012;197: 217–220. 10.1016/j.psychres.2011.09.021 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources