Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Mar;43(2):366-406.
doi: 10.1017/S0305000915000033. Epub 2015 Jun 4.

A parent-directed language intervention for children of low socioeconomic status: a randomized controlled pilot study

Affiliations

A parent-directed language intervention for children of low socioeconomic status: a randomized controlled pilot study

Dana L Suskind et al. J Child Lang. 2016 Mar.

Abstract

We designed a parent-directed home-visiting intervention targeting socioeconomic status (SES) disparities in children's early language environments. A randomized controlled trial was used to evaluate whether the intervention improved parents' knowledge of child language development and increased the amount and diversity of parent talk. Twenty-three mother-child dyads (12 experimental, 11 control, aged 1;5-3;0) participated in eight weekly hour-long home-visits. In the experimental group, but not the control group, parent knowledge of language development increased significantly one week and four months after the intervention. In lab-based observations, parent word types and tokens and child word types increased significantly one week, but not four months, post-intervention. In home-based observations, adult word tokens, conversational turn counts, and child vocalization counts increased significantly during the intervention, but not post-intervention. The results demonstrate the malleability of child-directed language behaviors and knowledge of child language development among low-SES parents.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Participation from recruitment to analysis.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
The temporal pattern of intervention effects on LENA outcomes over study period.
Fig. 3a–c.
Fig. 3a–c.
Experimental participants’ (n = 12) and control participants’ (n = 11) hourly adult word count averages and hourly LENA (v3·1·5) Natural Language Corpus percentiles.*
Fig. 4a–c.
Fig. 4a–c.
Experimental participants’ (n = 12) and control participants’ (n = 11) hourly conversational turn count averages and hourly LENA (v3·1·5) Natural Language Corpus percentiles.*
Fig. 5a–c.
Fig. 5a–c.
Experimental participants’ (n = 12) and control participants’ (n = 11) hourly child vocalizations count averages and hourly LENA (v3·1·5) Natural Language Corpus percentiles.*

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Abraham C & Michie S (2008). A taxonomy of behavior change techniques used in interventions. Health Psychology 27(3), 379–87. - PubMed
    1. Ajzen I (1996). The directive influence of attitudes on behavior. In Gollwitzer PM & Bargh JA (eds), The psychology of action: linking cognition and motivation to behavior, 385–403. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
    1. Algozzine B, Wang C & Boukhtiarov A (2011). A comparison of progress monitoring scores and end-of-grade achievement. New Waves-Educational Research & Development 14(1), 3–21.
    1. Aronson J, Fried CB & Good C (2002). Reducing the effects of stereotype threat on African American college students by shaping theories of intelligence. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 38(2), 113–25.
    1. Baxendale J & Hesketh A (2003). Comparison of the effectiveness of the Hanen ParentProgramme and traditional clinic therapy. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders/Royal College of Speech & Language Therapists 38(4), 397–415. - PubMed