Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 May 18:2:32.
doi: 10.3389/fmed.2015.00032. eCollection 2015.

Views of general practitioners on indoor environmental health risks in the perinatal period

Gladys Ibanez  1 , Jehan Zabar  2 , Jean-Sébastien Cadwallader  3 , Claire Rondet  2 , Matthias Lochard  4 , Anne Marie Magnier  1
Affiliations

Views of general practitioners on indoor environmental health risks in the perinatal period

Gladys Ibanez et al. Front Med (Lausanne). .

Abstract

Background: Home is generally perceived as a safety place, whereas the concentration of pollutants, influenced not only by external pollution but also by human activities, the presence of domestic animals, construction and furniture materials, are sometimes greater than outside.

Objectives: The aim of this study is to determine the general practitioners' (GPs) views on indoor environmental health risks in the perinatal period.

Methods: Four semi-structured focus group with 31 GPs were conducted in two French departments in November 2009, February, March, and April 2010. The focus group meetings were analyzed using a general thematic analysis.

Results: Perinatal care is a special health issue and a time of privileged sensitization. The attitude of health risks are well known in the case of "traditionally" toxic substances. In the case of "emerging" environmental exposure, these attitudes depend on the knowledge, beliefs, and experience specific to each practitioner. GPs are acquiring a new role in the field of environmental health, while at the same time coming to grips with its own strengths and limitations. The implementation of prevention depends on factors, which are not only specific to the practitioner but also related to the parents and the organization of the medical practice.

Conclusion: The sensitization of GPs to environmental medicine, promotion of eco-citizen education, development of research, and the distribution of information are some of the means which need to be implemented to prevent harmful exposure of the infant.

Keywords: child and adolescent development; family health; prevention; primary care; qualitative research/study; respiratory diseases.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Barker DJ. In utero programming of chronic disease. Clin Sci (Lond) (1998) 95:115–2810.1042/CS19980019 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Van den Bergh BR. Developmental programming of early brain and behaviour development and mental health: a conceptual framework. Dev Med Child Neurol (2011) 53(Suppl 4):19–23.10.1111/j.1469-8749.2011.04057.x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Zeghnoun A, Dor F. Description du budget espace-temps et estimation de l’exposition de la population française dans son logement. Saint-Maurice: Institut de veille sanitaire; (2010). 37 p. Available from: www.invs.sante.fr
    1. Kirchner S. [Home pollutants: where does France stand?]. Rev Mal Respir (2007) 24(2):236–710.1016/S0761-8425(07)91047-5 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Centre d’Enseignement et de Recherche pour l’Environnement et la Santé (CERES). Il était une fois.ma chambre, mon univers, ma santé. Guide d’accompagnement pour les professionnels de la santé. Available from: http://www.sante-environnement.be/spip.php?article97