Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2016 Sep;31(3):466-71.
doi: 10.1007/s13187-015-0866-4.

A Review of the Effectiveness of Breast Surgical Oncology Fellowship Programs Utilizing Kirkpatrick's Evaluation Model

Affiliations
Review

A Review of the Effectiveness of Breast Surgical Oncology Fellowship Programs Utilizing Kirkpatrick's Evaluation Model

Jory S Simpson et al. J Cancer Educ. 2016 Sep.

Abstract

It has been 10 years since the first class of Society of Surgical Oncology (SSO) fellowship trained Breast Surgical Oncologist entered practice. To date, there has been no publications examining the effectiveness of these training programs that are today throughout North America and Europe. This evaluative review examines the effectiveness of these fellowship training programs through the lens of the Kirkpatrick Evaluation Model. An extensive review of the literature was performed, and articles were categorized to capture how fellows are reacting to the program, what they are learning, and how the program is effecting their career path and impacting their patients. We can conclude that there is both direct and indirect evidence to support the effectiveness of this training program, but there is a paucity of direct evidence as one progresses from a level 1 Kirkpatrick analysis to a level 4. This review sets the framework for program evaluation in surgical fellowships and should encourage stakeholders to constantly evaluate the impact their program is having on trainees and oncology patients.

Keywords: Breast surgery; Fellowship; Program evaluation; Surgical oncology.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. BMJ. 1996 Jan 20;312(7024):145-8 - PubMed
    1. Ann Surg. 2009 May;249(5):828-33 - PubMed
    1. Cancer. 2004 Sep 15;101(6):1323-9 - PubMed
    1. World J Surg. 2004 Jan;28(1):80-6 - PubMed
    1. Ann Surg. 2008 Aug;248(2):154-62 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources