Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2015 Sep;12(3):4219-4229.
doi: 10.3892/mmr.2015.3904. Epub 2015 Jun 9.

Recombinant LH supplementation during IVF cycles with a GnRH-antagonist in estimated poor responders: A cross-matched pilot investigation of the optimal daily dose and timing

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Recombinant LH supplementation during IVF cycles with a GnRH-antagonist in estimated poor responders: A cross-matched pilot investigation of the optimal daily dose and timing

Salvatore Gizzo et al. Mol Med Rep. 2015 Sep.

Abstract

Although it is widely accepted that patients, who are considered poor responders to in vitro fertilization (IVF) benefit from recombinant luteinizing hormone (rLH) supplementation during an in vitro fertilization cycle, particularly when gonadotropin‑releasing hormone (GnRH)‑antagonist (ant) treatment is used the optimal administration timing and daily dose of rLH remains to be elucidated. The aim of the present study was to investigate the optimal timing of rLH‑supplementation to improve ovarian response, embryo quality, endometrial thickness and pregnancy rate in infertile, estimated poor responders to IVF, undergoing GnRH‑ant treatment. In addition, the present study aimed to evaluate the optimal daily dose to achieve the same outcomes. A prospective‑randomized‑cross‑matched investigation was performed on 40 patients undergoing a GnRH‑ant‑treatment‑cycle The patients were randomly assigned to either group A (rLH‑75 IU/day) or group B (rLH‑150 IU/day) and further randomized into subgroup A1/B1, in which rLH was administered at recombinant follicle stimulating hormone (rFSH) administration, and subgroup A2/B2, in which rLH was administered at GnRH‑ant administration. Patients who did not become pregnant during the first cycle (35 patients), were treated a second time, cross‑matched for groups and subgroups. Improved ovarian response, embryo quality and pregnancy rate were achieved by administering rLH at 150 IU/day, starting from GnRH‑ant administration, independently from the total rLH dose administered. Improved endometrial thickness at oocyte retrieval day was achieved by administering rLH at 150 IU from the start of rFSH administration. These data led to the hypothesis that ovarian responses are affected by the timing of administration more than the total‑dose of rLH. The optimal window to administer rLH appears to be the mid‑to‑late follicular phase, despite the fact that rLH‑supplementation in the early‑follicular phase appeared to increase endometrial thickness and to enhance its morphology. Standardization of the optimal daily dose and supplementation timing of rLH may resolve the debate regarding its efficacy in increasing the number of pregnancies and neonatal survival rates.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Total number of follicles at hCG administration. Stratification data between the subgroups and cohorts (recombinant luteinizing hormone supplementation: daily dose, vs. timing, vs. total dose). hcg, human chorionic gonadotropin.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Number of follicles measuring >16 mm at hCG administration. Stratified data between the subgroups and cohorts (recombinant luteinizing hormone supplementation: daily dose, vs. timing, vs. total dose). hcg, human chorionic gonadotropin.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Total number of oocytes retrieved. Stratified data between the subgroups and cohorts (recombinant luteinizing hormone supplementation: daily dose, vs. timing, vs. total dose).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Number of MII oocytes: stratification data between the subgroups and cohorts (recombinant luteinizing hormone supplementation: daily dose, vs. timing, vs. total dose).
Figure 5
Figure 5
Endometrial thickness at oocyte retrieval: stratification data between the subgroups and cohorts (recombinant luteinizing hormone supplementation: daily dose, vs. timing, vs. total dose).

References

    1. Qiao J, Wang ZB, Feng HL, Miao YL, Wang Q, Yu Y, et al. The root of reduced fertility in aged women and possible therapentic options: Current status and future perspects. Mol Aspects Med. 2014;38:54–85. doi: 10.1016/j.mam.2013.06.001. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gizzo S, Andrisani A, Esposito F, Oliva A, Zicchina C, Capuzzo D, et al. Ovarian reserve test: An impartial means to resolve the mismatch between chronological and biological age in the assessment of female reproductive chances. Reprod Sci. 2014;21:632–639. doi: 10.1177/1933719113508821. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ferraretti AP, La Marca A, Fauser BC, Tarlatzis B, Nargund G, Gianaroli L. ESHRE working group on poor ovarian response definition. ESHRE consensus on the definition of 'poor response' to ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization: the Bologna criteria. Hum Reprod. 2011;26:1616–1624. doi: 10.1093/humrep/der092. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Patrelli TS, Gizzo S, Sianesi N, Levati L, Pezzuto A, Ferrari B, et al. Anti-Müllerian hormone serum values and ovarian reserve: can it predict a decrease in fertility after ovarian stimulation by ART cycles? PLoS One. 2012;7:e44571. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0044571. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sunkara SK, Coomarasamy A, Faris R, Braude P, Khalaf Y. Long gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist vs. short agonist vs. antagonist regimens in poor responders undergoing in vitro fertilization: a randomized controlled trial. Fertil Steril. 2014;101:147–153. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.09.035. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources