Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Sep 15;61(6):996-1003.
doi: 10.1093/cid/civ437. Epub 2015 Jun 9.

Lower Newborn Bone Mineral Content Associated With Maternal Use of Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate During Pregnancy

Collaborators, Affiliations

Lower Newborn Bone Mineral Content Associated With Maternal Use of Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate During Pregnancy

George K Siberry et al. Clin Infect Dis. .

Abstract

Background: Fetal bone effects of maternal tenofovir use have not been well studied. We sought to compare whole-body bone mineral content (BMC) of newborns exposed vs not exposed to tenofovir in utero.

Methods: We enrolled participants from April 2011 to June 2013 at 14 US clinical sites. Singleton infants of women with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection who took tenofovir in late pregnancy (tenofovir-exposed) or no tenofovir during pregnancy (tenofovir-unexposed) were enrolled during late pregnancy or within 72 hours of birth. Infants born before 36 weeks gestation or with confirmed HIV infection were excluded. Whole-body BMC was measured in the first month of life and compared with that of the tenofovir-exposed and tenofovir-unexposed newborns, unadjusted and adjusted for covariates.

Results: Seventy-four tenofovir-exposed and 69 tenofovir-unexposed infants had evaluable BMC measurements. Tenofovir-exposed mothers were more likely to be married (31% vs 22%; P = .04) and to use boosted protease inhibitors (84% vs 62%; P = .004). Tenofovir-exposed newborns did not differ from unexposed newborns on mean gestational age (38.2 vs 38.1 weeks) or mean length (-0.41 vs -0.18) or weight (-0.71 vs -0.48) Z-scores. The mean (standard deviation) BMC of tenofovir-exposed infants was 12% lower than for unexposed infants (56.0 [11.8] vs 63.8 [16.6] g; P = .002). The adjusted mean bone mineral content was 5.3 g lower (95% confidence interval, -9.5, -1.2; P = .013) in the tenofovir-exposed infants.

Conclusions: Maternal tenofovir use is associated with significantly lower neonatal BMC. The duration and clinical significance of this finding should be evaluated in longitudinal studies.

Clinical trials registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01310023.

Keywords: HIV; infant bone mineral content; intrauterine exposure; tenofovir.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Participants were enrolled 2 April 2011 to 4 June 2013 during pregnancy (gestation age ≥23 weeks) through 2 weeks after birth. Eligibility was confirmed at birth for those enrolled before birth; 21 infants were excluded for the following reasons: gestational age less than 36 weeks (N = 16, 1 of whom was fetal demise), born at another hospital (N = 1), stillborn (N = 1), mother lost custody of child (N = 1), disqualifying change in maternal antiretroviral regimen during pregnancy (N = 2). Abbreviations: DXA, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry; TDF, tenofovir disoproxil fumarate.

Comment in

  • Reply to Koo et al.
    Siberry GK, Jacobson DL; for coauthors and the Pediatric HIV/AIDS Cohort Study. Siberry GK, et al. Clin Infect Dis. 2016 May 15;62(10):1324-5. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciw116. Epub 2016 Mar 1. Clin Infect Dis. 2016. PMID: 26936672 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
  • Bone Mineral Content in Neonates.
    Koo W, Caldito G, Bocchini J Jr. Koo W, et al. Clin Infect Dis. 2016 May 15;62(10):1323-4. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciw115. Epub 2016 Mar 1. Clin Infect Dis. 2016. PMID: 26936674 No abstract available.

References

    1. World Health Organization consolidated guidelines on the use of antiretroviral drugs for treating and preventing HIV infection: recommendations for a public health approach, 2013. Available at: http://www.who.int/hiv/pub/guidelines/arv2013/download/en/. Accessed 15 March 2015. - PubMed
    1. Panel on Antiretroviral Guidelines for Adults and Adolescents. Guidelines for the use of antiretroviral agents in HIV-1-infected adults and adolescents. Department of Health and Human Services; Available at: http://aidsinfo.nih.gov/ContentFiles/AdultandAdolescentGL.pdf. Accessed 15 March 2015.
    1. Gallant JE, Staszewski S, Pozniak AL et al. . Efficacy and safety of tenofovir DF vs stavudine in combination therapy in antiretroviral-naive patients: a 3-year randomized trial. JAMA 2004; 292:191–201. - PubMed
    1. Stellbrink H-J, Orkin C, Arribas JR et al. . Comparison of changes in bone density and turnover with abacavir-lamivudine versus tenofovir-emtricitabine in HIV-infected adults: 48-week results from the ASSERT study . Clin Infect Dis 2010; 51:963–72. - PubMed
    1. McComsey GA, Kitch D, Daar ES et al. . Bone mineral density and fractures in antiretroviral-naive persons randomized to receive abacavir-lamivudine or tenofovir disoproxil fumarate-emtricitabine along with efavirenz or atazanavir-ritonavir: AIDS Clinical Trials Group A5224s, a Substudy of ACTG A5202. J Infect Dis 2011; 203:1791–801. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data