Consistency and inconsistency in network meta-analysis: model estimation using multivariate meta-regression
- PMID: 26062085
- PMCID: PMC4433771
- DOI: 10.1002/jrsm.1045
Consistency and inconsistency in network meta-analysis: model estimation using multivariate meta-regression
Abstract
Network meta-analysis (multiple treatments meta-analysis, mixed treatment comparisons) attempts to make the best use of a set of studies comparing more than two treatments. However, it is important to assess whether a body of evidence is consistent or inconsistent. Previous work on models for network meta-analysis that allow for heterogeneity between studies has either been restricted to two-arm trials or followed a Bayesian framework. We propose two new frequentist ways to estimate consistency and inconsistency models by expressing them as multivariate random-effects meta-regressions, which can be implemented in some standard software packages. We illustrate the approach using the mvmeta package in Stata. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
References
-
- Brooks SP, Gelman A. General methods for monitoring convergence of iterative simulations. J Comput Graph Stat. 1998;7:434–455.
-
- Dias S, Welton NJ, Caldwell DM, Ades AE. Checking consistency in mixed treatment comparison meta-analysis. Stat Med. 2010;29:932–944. - PubMed
-
- Gasparrini A. 2011. mvmeta: multivariate meta-analysis and meta-regression. R package version 0.2.3.
-
- Hamza TH, van Houwelingen HC, Stijnen T. The binomial distribution of meta-analysis was preferred to model within-study variability. J Clin Epidemiol. 2008;61:41–51. - PubMed
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources