Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Feb;26(2):322-30.
doi: 10.1007/s00330-015-3845-6. Epub 2015 Jun 12.

Magnetic resonance imaging texture analysis classification of primary breast cancer

Affiliations

Magnetic resonance imaging texture analysis classification of primary breast cancer

S A Waugh et al. Eur Radiol. 2016 Feb.

Abstract

Objectives: Patient-tailored treatments for breast cancer are based on histological and immunohistochemical (IHC) subtypes. Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) texture analysis (TA) may be useful in non-invasive lesion subtype classification.

Methods: Women with newly diagnosed primary breast cancer underwent pre-treatment dynamic contrast-enhanced breast MRI. TA was performed using co-occurrence matrix (COM) features, by creating a model on retrospective training data, then prospectively applying to a test set. Analyses were blinded to breast pathology. Subtype classifications were performed using a cross-validated k-nearest-neighbour (k = 3) technique, with accuracy relative to pathology assessed and receiver operator curve (AUROC) calculated. Mann-Whitney U and Kruskal-Wallis tests were used to assess raw entropy feature values.

Results: Histological subtype classifications were similar across training (n = 148 cancers) and test sets (n = 73 lesions) using all COM features (training: 75%, AUROC = 0.816; test: 72.5%, AUROC = 0.823). Entropy features were significantly different between lobular and ductal cancers (p < 0.001; Mann-Whitney U). IHC classifications using COM features were also similar for training and test data (training: 57.2%, AUROC = 0.754; test: 57.0%, AUROC = 0.750). Hormone receptor positive and negative cancers demonstrated significantly different entropy features. Entropy features alone were unable to create a robust classification model.

Conclusion: Textural differences on contrast-enhanced MR images may reflect underlying lesion subtypes, which merits testing against treatment response.

Key points: • MR-derived entropy features, representing heterogeneity, provide important information on tissue composition. • Entropy features can differentiate between histological and immunohistochemical subtypes of breast cancer. • Differing entropy features between breast cancer subtypes implies differences in lesion heterogeneity. • Texture analysis of breast cancer potentially provides added information for decision making.

Keywords: Breast cancer; Classification; Histological subtypes and immunohistochemical profiles; Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI); Texture analysis (TA).

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Magn Reson Med. 2007 Sep;58(3):562-71 - PubMed
    1. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2002 Jan;15(1):68-74 - PubMed
    1. Acad Radiol. 2008 Dec;15(12):1513-25 - PubMed
    1. J Magn Reson Imaging. 1997 Nov-Dec;7(6):1016-26 - PubMed
    1. Med Phys. 2009 Apr;36(4):1236-43 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources