Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Jul;8(4):749-56.
doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.115.002161. Epub 2015 Jun 11.

E/e' Ratio in Patients With Unexplained Dyspnea: Lack of Accuracy in Estimating Left Ventricular Filling Pressure

Mário Santos  1 , Jose Rivero  1 , Shane D McCullough  1 , Erin West  1 , Alexander R Opotowsky  1 , Aaron B Waxman  1 , David M Systrom  1 , Amil M Shah  2
Affiliations

E/e' Ratio in Patients With Unexplained Dyspnea: Lack of Accuracy in Estimating Left Ventricular Filling Pressure

Mário Santos et al. Circ Heart Fail. 2015 Jul.

Abstract

Background: Elevated left ventricular filling pressure is a cardinal feature of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Mitral E/e' ratio has been proposed as a noninvasive measure of left ventricular filling pressure. We studied the accuracy of E/e' to estimate and track changes of left ventricular filling pressure in patients with unexplained dyspnea.

Methods and results: We performed supine and upright transthoracic echocardiography in 118 patients with unexplained dyspnea who underwent right heart catheterization. Supine E/e' ratio modestly but significantly correlated with supine pulmonary arterial wedge pressure (PAWP; r=0.36; P<0.001) and demonstrated poor agreement with PAWP values (Bland-Altman limits of agreement of -8.3 to 8.3 mm Hg; range, 6.5-21.2 mm Hg). Similarly, E/e' ratio cut off of 13 performed poorly in identifying patients with elevated left ventricular filling pressure (sensitivity 6%, specificity 90%). The receiver-operating characteristic area of E/e' was 0.65 (95% confidencce interval, 0.50-0.79). With change from the supine to upright position, PAWP decreased (-5±4 mm Hg; P<0.001) as did both E wave (-17±15 cm/s; P<0.001) and e' (-2.7±2.7 cm/s; P<0.001) velocities, whereas E/e' remained stable (+0.2±2.6; P=0.57). Positional change in PAWP correlated modestly with change in E-wave (r=0.37; P<0.001) velocity. There was no appreciable relationship between change in PAWP and change in average E/e' (r=-0.04; P=0.77) and in half the patients the change in PAWP and E/e' were directionally opposite.

Conclusions: In patients with unexplained dyspnea, E/e' ratio neither accurately estimates PAWP nor identifies patients with elevated PAWP consistent with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Positional changes in E/e' ratio do not reflect changes in PAWP.

Keywords: dyspnea; echocardiography; heart failure; hemodynamics; pulmonary wedge pressure.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Relationship between PAWP measured by RHC and estimated by E/e’ ratio. Legend: The modest correlation between the PAWP derived by E/e’ and directly measured by RHC is shown in the scatter plot (A). The Bland-Altman plot (B) demonstrates no bias, but wide a limits of agreement (±7.7 mmHg).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Response of E wave, e’ average and E/e’ ratio to PAWP changes (supine to upright). Both E wave (A) and e’ average (B) had a positive correlation to PAWP changes, although the latter was not statistically significant. No linear relationship between E/e’ ratio and PAWP (C) was found.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Supine PAWP by average E/e’ ratio groups using the recommended cut-off of 13. Despite the observed differences of mean PAWP (11±4 vs 14±6 mmHg; p=0.001), the overlap between groups is significant.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Parshall MB, Schwartzstein RM, Adams L, Banzett RB, Manning HL, Bourbeau J, Calverley PM, Gift AG, Harver A, Lareau SC, Mahler DA, Meek PM, O'Donnell DE. An official american thoracic society statement: Update on the mechanisms, assessment, and management of dyspnea. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2012;185:435–452. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wachter R, Edelmann F. Diagnosis of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Heart Fail Clin. 2014;10:399–406. - PubMed
    1. Ommen SR, Nishimura RA, Appleton CP, Miller FA, Oh JK, Redfield MM, Tajik AJ. Clinical utility of doppler echocardiography and tissue doppler imaging in the estimation of left ventricular filling pressures: A comparative simultaneous doppler-catheterization study. Circulation. 2000;102:1788–1794. - PubMed
    1. Nagueh SF, Appleton CP, Gillebert TC, Marino PN, Oh JK, Smiseth OA, Waggoner AD, Flachskampf FA, Pellikka PA, Evangelisa A. Recommendations for the evaluation of left ventricular diastolic function by echocardiography. Eur J Echocardiogr. 2009;10:165–193. - PubMed
    1. Paulus WJ, Tschope C, Sanderson JE, Rusconi C, Flachskampf FA, Rademakers FE, Marino P, Smiseth OA, De Keulenaer G, Leite-Moreira AF, Borbely A, Edes I, Handoko ML, Heymans S, Pezzali N, Pieske B, Dickstein K, Fraser AG, Brutsaert DL. How to diagnose diastolic heart failure: A consensus statement on the diagnosis of heart failure with normal left ventricular ejection fraction by the heart failure and echocardiography associations of the european society of cardiology. Eur Heart J. 2007;28:2539–2550. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms