Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2015 Jun 12;218(11):649-53.
doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2015.505.

A multicentre audit of GDPs knowledge of orthodontic retention

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

A multicentre audit of GDPs knowledge of orthodontic retention

S Kotecha et al. Br Dent J. .

Erratum in

  • Erratum.
    [No authors listed] [No authors listed] Br Dent J. 2015 Jul 24;219(2):59. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2015.588. Br Dent J. 2015. PMID: 26205929

Abstract

Objective: To determine GDP knowledge and willingness to supervise orthodontic retention and provide replacements retainers.

Design: An audit sampling GDPs from six centres within England (Bradford, Cambridge, Burton-Upon-Trent, Croyden, Norwich and Plymouth). A gold standard of 100% of GDPs should be aware of commonly used retainers and be able to provide replacements was selected.

Method: Overall, 1,053 postal questionnaires were sent to local GDPs. The questions covered knowledge and provision of various retainers, practitioner background and education. GDP satisfaction with the information provided by the orthodontist at discharge was also explored.

Results: Five hundred and two questionnaires were received (response rate of 48%). The majority of GDPs (64%) were trained in the UK. Awareness of vacuum-formed, Hawley and fixed retainers was generally high. A significantly smaller number of GDPs were willing to prescribe, fit or review the retainers. The most common reasons for reluctance in provision were insufficient knowledge, financial and time constraints. Over two thirds (72%) of GDPs would like further training on retention.

Conclusion: This audit highlights a need for increased training at undergraduate and postgraduate levels to update practitioners about contemporary retention practice. Better communication is required from orthodontists to GDPs to ensure that on discharge the dentist is aware of the retainer type and retention regime.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Br Dent J. 2005 Aug 27;199(4):224-32 - PubMed
    1. BMJ. 2002 May 18;324(7347):1183 - PubMed
    1. Am J Orthod. 1967 Oct;53(10):721-45 - PubMed
    1. Eur J Orthod. 2010 Apr;32(2):165-70 - PubMed
    1. J Orthod. 2005 Sep;32(3):206-10 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources