Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2015 Jul;56(4):1122-7.
doi: 10.3349/ymj.2015.56.4.1122.

Head Elevation in Spinal-Epidural Anesthesia Provides Improved Hemodynamics and Appropriate Sensory Block Height at Caesarean Section

Mi Hyeon Lee  1 , Eun Mi Kim  1 , Jun Hyeon Bae  1 , Sung Ho Park  2 , Mi Hwa Chung  1 , Young Ryong Choi  1 , Eun Mi Choi  3
Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Head Elevation in Spinal-Epidural Anesthesia Provides Improved Hemodynamics and Appropriate Sensory Block Height at Caesarean Section

Mi Hyeon Lee et al. Yonsei Med J. 2015 Jul.

Abstract

Purpose: We aimed to determine whether head elevation during combined spinal-epidural anesthesia (CSE) and Caesarean section provided improved hemodynamics and appropriate sensory block height.

Materials and methods: Forty-four parous women undergoing CSE for elective Caesarean section were randomly assigned to one of two groups: right lateral (group L) or right lateral and head elevated (group HE) position, for insertion of the block. Patients were positioned in the supine wedged position (group L) or the left lateral and head elevated position (group HE) until a block height of T5 to light touch was reached. Group HE was then turned to the supine wedged position with maintenance of head elevation until the end of surgery. Hemodynamics, including the incidence of hypotension, ephedrine dose required, and characteristics of the sensory blocks were analyzed.

Results: The incidence of hypotension (16 versus 7, p=0.0035) and the required dose of ephedrine [24 (0-40) versus 0 (0-20), p<0.0001] were greater in group L compared to group HE. In group L, the time to achieve maximal sensory block level (MSBL) was shorter (11.8±5.4 min versus 20.1±6.3 min, p<0.0001) and MSBL was also higher than in group HE [14 (T2) versus 12 (T4), p=0.0015].

Conclusion: Head elevation during CSE and Caesarean section is superior to positioning without head elevation in the lateral to supine position, as it is associated with a more gradual onset, appropriate block height, and improved hemodynamics.

Keywords: Anesthesia obstetrical; Caesarean section; anesthesia spinal.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no financial conflicts of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. Flow chart of patients enrolled and dropped-out in the two groups.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2. Number of dermatomes blocked after subarachnoid injection of 10 mg of 0.5% bupivacaine and 10 μg of fentanyl in the lateral and head elevated (group HE) and lateral (group L) position groups. Dermatome 1=L3; 12=T4; 14=T2 of sensory block level. *p<0.05.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3. Changes in mean arterial pressure (MAP, A) and heart rate (HR, B) after subarachnoid injection of 10 mg of 0.5% bupivacaine and 10 μg of fentanyl in the lateral and head elevated (group HE) and lateral (group L) position groups. *p<0.05 compared with baseline value in each group. B, baseline; BL, baseline lateral.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Phelan DM, MacEvilly M. A comparison of hyper- and isobaric solutions of bupivacaine for subarachnoid block. Anaesth Intensive Care. 1984;12:101–107. - PubMed
    1. Carrie LE, O'Sullivan G. Subarachnoid bupivacaine 0.5% for caesarean section. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 1984;1:275–283. - PubMed
    1. Patel M, Samsoon G, Swami A, Morgan B. Posture and the spread of hyperbaric bupivacaine in parturients using the combined spinal epidural technique. Can J Anaesth. 1993;40:943–946. - PubMed
    1. James KS, McGrady E, Patrick A. Combined spinal-extradural anaesthesia for preterm and term caesarean section: is there a difference in local anaesthetic requirements? Br J Anaesth. 1997;78:498–501. - PubMed
    1. Carrie LE. Spinal and/or epidural blockade for Caesarean section. In: Reynolds F, editor. Epidural and spinal blockade in obstetrics. London: Bailliere-Tindall; 1990. pp. 139–150.

Publication types