Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Jul;56(7):1003-1010.
doi: 10.2967/jnumed.115.154336. Epub 2015 Jun 11.

¹⁸F-DCFBC PET/CT for PSMA-Based Detection and Characterization of Primary Prostate Cancer

Affiliations

¹⁸F-DCFBC PET/CT for PSMA-Based Detection and Characterization of Primary Prostate Cancer

Steven P Rowe et al. J Nucl Med. 2015 Jul.

Abstract

We previously demonstrated the ability to detect metastatic prostate cancer using N-[N-[(S)-1,3-dicarboxypropyl]carbamoyl]-4-(18)F-fluorobenzyl-L-cysteine ((18)F-DCFBC), a low-molecular-weight radiotracer that targets the prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA). PSMA has been shown to be associated with higher Gleason grade and more aggressive disease. An imaging biomarker able to detect clinically significant high-grade primary prostate cancer reliably would address an unmet clinical need by allowing for risk-adapted patient management.

Methods: We enrolled 13 patients with primary prostate cancer who were imaged with (18)F-DCFBC PET before scheduled prostatectomy, with 12 of these patients also undergoing pelvic prostate MR imaging. Prostate (18)F-DCFBC PET was correlated with MR imaging and histologic and immunohistochemical analysis on a prostate-segment (12 regions) and dominant-lesion basis. There were no incidental extraprostatic findings on PET suggestive of metastatic disease.

Results: MR imaging was more sensitive than (18)F-DCFBC PET for detection of primary prostate cancer on a per-segment (sensitivities of up to 0.17 and 0.39 for PET and MR imaging, respectively) and per-dominant-lesion analysis (sensitivities of 0.46 and 0.92 for PET and MR imaging, respectively). However, (18)F-DCFBC PET was more specific than MR imaging by per-segment analysis (specificities of 0.96 and 0.89 for PET and MR imaging for corresponding sensitivity, respectively) and specific for detection of high-grade lesions (Gleason 8 and 9) greater than 1.0 mL in size (4/4 of these patients positive by PET). (18)F-DCFBC uptake in tumors was positively correlated with Gleason score (ρ = 0.64; PSMA expression, ρ = 0.47; and prostate-specific antigen, ρ = 0.52). There was significantly lower (18)F-DCFBC uptake in benign prostatic hypertrophy than primary tumors (median maximum standardized uptake value, 2.2 vs. 3.5; P = 0.004).

Conclusion: Although the sensitivity of (18)F-DCFBC for primary prostate cancer was less than MR imaging, (18)F-DCFBC PET was able to detect the more clinically significant high-grade and larger-volume tumors (Gleason score 8 and 9) with higher specificity than MR imaging. In particular, there was relatively low (18)F-DCFBC PET uptake in benign prostatic hypertrophy lesions, compared with cancer in the prostate, which may allow for more specific detection of primary prostate cancer by (18)F-DCFBC PET. This study demonstrates the utility of PSMA-based PET, which may be used in conjunction with MR imaging to identify clinically significant prostate cancer.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01496157.

Keywords: MRI; PET/CT; primary prostate cancer; prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA); prostatectomy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
18F-DCFBC chemical structure.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Correlation between focal uptake in right lateral prostate apex (arrowhead) on 18F-DCFBC PET (A), abnormal low T2 signal (arrowhead) on MR imaging (B), and tumor on gross surgical pathology, as outlined in green (C). Pathologic specimen from same tumor shows strong immunohistochemical staining for PSMA (brown color) (D).
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Scatterplot of 18F-DCFBC PET SUVmax and prostatectomy Gleason score for pelvic 2D, pelvic 3D, and WB PET acquisitions showing strong positive correlation.
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 4
18F-DCFBC PET (A) and T2-weighted MR (B) images demonstrating 18F-DCFBC photopenia for representative example of BPH nodules (arrowheads) within central prostate.
FIGURE 5
FIGURE 5
Plot showing ranges of SUVmax in BPH, all PET-positive prostate cancers (nonstringent analysis), and tumors with PET positivity only in stringent analysis.

References

    1. Siegel R, Ma J, Zou Z, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2014. CA Cancer J Clin. 2014;64:9–29. - PubMed
    1. Cuzick J, Thorat MA, Andriole G, et al. Prevention and early detection of prostate cancer. Lancet Oncol. 2014;15:e484–e492. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chang AJ, Autio KA, Roach M, 3rd, Scher HI. High-risk prostate cancer-classification and therapy. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2014;11:308–323. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Johnson LM, Turkbey B, Figg WD, Choyke PL. Multiparametric MRI in prostate cancer management. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2014;11:346–353. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dianat SS, Carter HB, Macura KJ. Performance of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation and management of clinically low-risk prostate cancer. Urol Oncol. 2014;32:39, e1–10. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Substances

Associated data