Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Jun 12;10(6):e0129358.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0129358. eCollection 2015.

Differing Dynamics of Intrapersonal and Interpersonal Coordination: Two-finger and Four-Finger Tapping Experiments

Affiliations

Differing Dynamics of Intrapersonal and Interpersonal Coordination: Two-finger and Four-Finger Tapping Experiments

Kentaro Kodama et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Finger-tapping experiments were conducted to examine whether the dynamics of intrapersonal and interpersonal coordination systems can be described equally by the Haken-Kelso-Bunz model, which describes inter-limb coordination dynamics. This article reports the results of finger-tapping experiments conducted in both systems. Two within-subject factors were investigated: the phase mode and the number of fingers. In the intrapersonal experiment (Experiment 1), the participants were asked to tap, paced by a gradually hastening auditory metronome, looking at their fingers moving, using the index finger in the two finger condition, or the index and middle finger in the four-finger condition. In the interpersonal experiment (Experiment 2), pairs of participants performed the task while each participant used the outside hand, tapping with the index finger in the two finger condition, or the index and middle finger in the four-finger condition. Some results did not agree with the HKB model predictions. First, from Experiment 1, no significant difference was observed in the movement stability between the in-phase and anti-phase modes in the two finger condition. Second, from Experiment 2, no significant difference was found in the movement stability between the in-phase and anti-phase mode in the four-finger condition. From these findings, different coordination dynamics were inferred between intrapersonal and interpersonal coordination systems against prediction from the previous studies. Results were discussed according to differences between intrapersonal and interpersonal coordination systems in the availability of perceptual information and the complexity in the interaction between limbs derived from a nested structure.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Two within-subject factors.
Phase mode: left, in-phase mode; right, anti-phase mode. Number of fingers: top, two-finger; bottom, four-finger.
Fig 2
Fig 2. Experimental setup of Experiment 1.
Experimental setup of an intrapersonal experiment.
Fig 3
Fig 3. Schematic diagram portraying the temporal relation between taps and beats.
L, left hand tap; R, right hand tap; ♪, metronome beat; Time elapses from left to right.
Fig 4
Fig 4. Percentage of phase transition occurrence.
Colors of bar indicate how many times the taps in the opposite phase mode repeated. From black (5 times), … to the lightest gray (2 times). 2f-in: two-finger in-phase condition, 2f-an: two-finger anti-phase condition, 4f-in: four-finger in-phase condition, 4f-an: four-finger anti-phase condition.
Fig 5
Fig 5. SD of relative phase.
Circle marker/rigid line represents two-finger in-phase condition, 2f-in; Triangle marker/rigid line represents two-finger anti-phase condition, 2f-an; Circle marker/dashed line represents four-finger in-phase condition, 4f-in; Triangle marker/dashed line represents four-finger anti-phase condition, 4f-an. Error bars represent the standard deviation.
Fig 6
Fig 6. Cross recurrence plots.
Cross recurrence plots of sample data for each of four conditions. Left-top, two-finger in-phase condition; Right-top, two-finger anti-phase condition; Left-bottom, four-finger in-phase condition; Right-bottom, four-finger anti-phase condition.
Fig 7
Fig 7. %Recurrence.
Circle marker/rigid line represents two-finger in-phase condition, 2f-in; Triangle marker/rigid line represents two-finger anti-phase condition, 2f-an; Circle marker/dashed line represents four-finger in-phase condition, 4f-in; Triangle marker/dashed line represents four-finger anti-phase condition, 4f-an. Error bars represent the standard deviation.
Fig 8
Fig 8. Average line length.
Circle marker/rigid line represents two-finger in-phase condition, 2f-in; Triangle marker/rigid line represents two-finger anti-phase condition, 2f-an; Circle marker/dashed line represents four-finger in-phase condition, 4f-in; Triangle marker/dashed line represents four-finger anti-phase condition, 4f-an. Error bars represent the standard deviation.
Fig 9
Fig 9. Average Relative Phase Distribution.
Circle marker/rigid line represents two-finger in-phase condition, 2f-in; Triangle marker/rigid line represents two-finger anti-phase condition, 2f-an; Circle marker/dashed line represents four-finger in-phase condition, 4f-in; Triangle marker/dashed line represents four-finger anti-phase condition, 4f-an. Error bars represent the standard deviation.
Fig 10
Fig 10. Experimental setup of Experiment 2.
Experimental setup of an interpersonal experiment.
Fig 11
Fig 11. Percentage of phase transition occurrence.
Colors of bar indicate how many times the taps in the opposite phase mode repeated. From black (5 times), … to the lightest gray (2 times). 2f-in: two-finger in-phase condition, 2f-an: two-finger anti-phase condition, 4f-in: four-finger in-phase condition, 4f-an: four-finger anti-phase condition.
Fig 12
Fig 12. SD of relative phase.
Circle marker/rigid line represents two-finger in-phase condition, 2f-in; Triangle marker/rigid line represents two-finger anti-phase condition, 2f-an; Circle marker/dashed line represents four-finger in-phase condition, 4f-in; Triangle marker/dashed line represents four-finger anti-phase condition, 4f-an. Error bars represent the standard deviation.
Fig 13
Fig 13. Cross recurrence plots.
Cross recurrence plots of sample data for each of four conditions. Left-top, two-finger in-phase condition; Right-top, two-finger anti-phase condition; Left-bottom, four-finger in-phase condition; Right-bottom, four-finger anti-phase condition.
Fig 14
Fig 14. %Recurrence.
Circle marker/rigid line represents two-finger in-phase condition, 2f-in; Triangle marker/rigid line represents two-finger anti-phase condition, 2f-an; Circle marker/dashed line represents four-finger in-phase condition, 4f-in; Triangle marker/dashed line represents four-finger anti-phase condition, 4f-an. Error bars represent the standard deviation.
Fig 15
Fig 15. Average line length.
Circle marker/rigid line represents two-finger in-phase condition, 2f-in; Triangle marker/rigid line represents two-finger anti-phase condition, 2f-an; Circle marker/dashed line represents four-finger in-phase condition, 4f-in; Triangle marker/dashed line represents four-finger anti-phase condition, 4f-an. Error bars represent the standard deviation.

References

    1. Bernstein NA (1996) On Dexterity and Its Development In Latash ML & Turvey MT (Eds.), Dexterity and its development, 3–244. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    1. Kelso JAS (1984) Phase transitions and critical behavior in human bimanual coordination. American Journal of Physiology—Regulatory 15: R1000–R1004. - PubMed
    1. Kelso JAS (1995) Dynamic patterns: The self-organization of brain and behavior. MIT Press.
    1. Haken H, Kelso JAS, Bunz H (1985) A theoretical model of phase transitions in human hand movements. Biological Cybernetics 51: 347–356. - PubMed
    1. Haken H. Synergetics: An Introduction Nonequilibrium Phase Transitions and Self-Organization in Physics, Chemistry and Biology (Springer Series in Synergetics). Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1977.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources