Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Sep;33(9):1119-25.
doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2015.04.024. Epub 2015 Apr 22.

Prehospital recognition of severe sepsis: development and validation of a novel EMS screening tool

Carmen C Polito  1 , Alex Isakov  2 , Arthur H Yancey 2nd  2 , Duncan K Wilson  3 , Blake A Anderson  4 , Ingrid Bloom  2 , Greg S Martin  5 , Jonathan E Sevransky  5
Affiliations

Prehospital recognition of severe sepsis: development and validation of a novel EMS screening tool

Carmen C Polito et al. Am J Emerg Med. 2015 Sep.

Abstract

Objective: To derive and validate a predictive model and novel emergency medical services (EMS) screening tool for severe sepsis (SS).

Design: Retrospective cohort study.

Setting: A single EMS system and an urban, public hospital.

Patients: Sequential adult, nontrauma, nonarrest, at-risk, EMS-transported patients between January 1, 2011, and December 31, 2012 were included in the study. At-risk patients were defined as having all 3 of the following criteria present in the EMS setting: (1) heart rate greater than 90 beats/min, (2) respiratory rate greater than 20 beats/min, and (3) systolic blood pressure less than 110 mm Hg.

Interventions: None.

Measurements and main results: Among 66,439 EMS encounters, 555 met the criteria for analysis. Fourteen percent (n = 75) of patients had SS, of which 19% (n = 14) were identified by EMS clinical judgment. In-hospital mortality for patients with SS was 31% (n = 23). Six EMS characteristics were found to be predictors of SS: older age, transport from nursing home, Emergency Medical Dispatch (EMD) 9-1-1 chief concern category of "sick person," hot tactile temperature assessment, low systolic blood pressure, and low oxygen saturation. The final predictive model showed good discrimination in derivation and validation subgroups (areas under curves, 0.843 and 0.820, respectively). Sensitivity of the final model was 91% in the derivation group and 78% in the validation group. At a predefined threshold of 2 or more points, prehospital severe sepsis (PRESS) score sensitivity was 86%.

Conclusions: The PRESS score is a novel EMS screening tool for SS that demonstrates a sensitivity of 86% and a specificity of 47%. Additional validation is needed before this tool can be recommended for widespread clinical use.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Patient Selection†
Definitions: EMR – Emergency Medical Record. † Inclusion criteria: age ≥ 18, EMS systolic blood pressure <110 mmHg, EMS heart rate >90 bpm, EMS respiratory rate >20bpm
Figure 2
Figure 2. ROC Curves for Derivation and Validation Subgroups*
Definitions: ROC – receiver-operating characteristic; AUC – area under curve *AUC derivation – 0.843; AUC validation 0.820
Figure 3
Figure 3. Pre-screening Flow Sheet
Definitions: SBP – systolic blood pressure; HR – heart rate; RR – respiratory rate
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Dellinger RP, et al. Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock: 2012. Crit Care Med. 2013;41(2):580–637. - PubMed
    1. Martin GS, et al. The epidemiology of sepsis in the United States from 1979 through 2000. N Engl J Med. 2003;348(16):1546–54. - PubMed
    1. Gaieski DF, et al. Benchmarking the incidence and mortality of severe sepsis in the United States. Crit Care Med. 2013;41(5):1167–74. - PubMed
    1. Angus DC, et al. Protocol-based care for early septic shock. N Engl J Med. 2014;371(4):386. - PubMed
    1. Seymour CW, et al. Severe sepsis in pre-hospital emergency care: analysis of incidence, care, and outcome. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2012;186(12):1264–71. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types