Identifying an Optimal Cutpoint for the Diagnosis of Hypertriglyceridemia in the Nonfasting State
- PMID: 26071491
- PMCID: PMC4554926
- DOI: 10.1373/clinchem.2015.241752
Identifying an Optimal Cutpoint for the Diagnosis of Hypertriglyceridemia in the Nonfasting State
Abstract
Background: Nonfasting triglycerides are similar or superior to fasting triglycerides at predicting cardiovascular events. However, diagnostic cutpoints are based on fasting triglycerides. We examined the optimal cutpoint for increased nonfasting triglycerides.
Methods: We obtained baseline nonfasting (<8 h since last meal) samples from 6391 participants in the Women's Health Study who were followed prospectively for ≤17 years. The optimal diagnostic threshold for nonfasting triglycerides, determined by logistic regression models by use of c-statistics and the Youden index (sum of sensitivity and specificity minus 1), was used to calculate hazard ratios (HRs) for incident cardiovascular events. Performance was compared to thresholds recommended by the American Heart Association (AHA) and European guidelines.
Results: The optimal threshold was 175 mg/dL (1.98 mmol/L), with a c-statistic of 0.656, statistically better than the AHA cutpoint of 200 mg/dL (c-statistic 0.628). For nonfasting triglycerides above and below 175 mg/dL, after adjusting for age, hypertension, smoking, hormone use, and menopausal status, the HR for cardiovascular events was 1.88 (95% CI 1.52-2.33, P < 0.001), and for triglycerides measured at 0-4 and 4-8 h since the last meal, 2.05 (1.54- 2.74) and 1.68 (1.21-2.32), respectively. We validated performance of this optimal cutpoint by use of 10-fold cross-validation and bootstrapping of multivariable models that included standard risk factors plus total and HDL cholesterol, diabetes, body mass index, and C-reactive protein.
Conclusions: In this study of middle-aged and older apparently healthy women, we identified a diagnostic threshold for nonfasting hypertriglyceridemia of 175 mg/dL (1.98 mmol/L), with the potential to more accurately identify cases than the currently recommended AHA cutpoint.
© 2015 American Association for Clinical Chemistry.
Figures


Comment in
-
Nonfasting Lipid Profiles: The Way of the Future.Clin Chem. 2015 Sep;61(9):1123-5. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2015.243139. Epub 2015 Jul 23. Clin Chem. 2015. PMID: 26206883 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Fasting compared with nonfasting triglycerides and risk of cardiovascular events in women.JAMA. 2007 Jul 18;298(3):309-16. doi: 10.1001/jama.298.3.309. JAMA. 2007. PMID: 17635891
-
Relation of triglyceride levels, fasting and nonfasting, to fatal and nonfatal coronary heart disease.Arch Intern Med. 2003 May 12;163(9):1077-83. doi: 10.1001/archinte.163.9.1077. Arch Intern Med. 2003. PMID: 12742806 Clinical Trial.
-
Nonfasting Mild-to-Moderate Hypertriglyceridemia and Risk of Acute Pancreatitis.JAMA Intern Med. 2016 Dec 1;176(12):1834-1842. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.6875. JAMA Intern Med. 2016. PMID: 27820614
-
Clinical relevance of non-fasting and postprandial hypertriglyceridemia and remnant cholesterol.Curr Vasc Pharmacol. 2011 May;9(3):281-6. doi: 10.2174/157016111795495585. Curr Vasc Pharmacol. 2011. PMID: 21314630 Review.
-
Nonfasting versus fasting lipid profile for cardiovascular risk prediction.Pathology. 2019 Feb;51(2):131-141. doi: 10.1016/j.pathol.2018.09.062. Epub 2018 Dec 3. Pathology. 2019. PMID: 30522787 Review.
Cited by
-
Beyond LDL-C: unravelling the residual atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk landscape-focus on hypertriglyceridaemia.Front Cardiovasc Med. 2024 Aug 7;11:1389106. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1389106. eCollection 2024. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2024. PMID: 39171323 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Determination of Fasting and Non-Fasting Cholesterol Levels of Low- and High-Density Lipoproteins with Homogenous Assays: A Promising Reliable Way to Assessment of Dyslipidemia.J Atheroscler Thromb. 2017 Jun 1;24(6):569-571. doi: 10.5551/jat.ED076. Epub 2017 May 10. J Atheroscler Thromb. 2017. PMID: 28496075 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Thresholds for postprandial hyperglycemia and hypertriglyceridemia associated with increased mortality risk in type 2 diabetes patients: A real-world longitudinal study.J Diabetes Investig. 2021 May;12(5):886-893. doi: 10.1111/jdi.13403. Epub 2020 Oct 20. J Diabetes Investig. 2021. PMID: 32918856 Free PMC article.
-
Optimal Cut-off Points of Triglycerides for Cardiovascular Disease Prediction in Japanese Population.J Atheroscler Thromb. 2023 Feb 1;30(2):105-106. doi: 10.5551/jat.ED210. Epub 2022 Jul 22. J Atheroscler Thromb. 2023. PMID: 35871560 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Examining the U-shaped relationship of sleep duration and systolic blood pressure with risk of cardiovascular events using a novel recursive gradient scanning model.Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023 Sep 14;10:1210171. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1210171. eCollection 2023. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023. PMID: 37790596 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Nordestgaard BG, Varbo A. Triglycerides and cardiovascular disease. Lancet. 2014;384:626–635. - PubMed
-
- Shai I, Rimm EB, Hankinson SE, Cannuscio C, Curhan G, Manson JE, Rifai N, Stampfer MJ, Ma J. Lipoprotein (a) and coronary heart disease among women: Beyond a cholesterol carrier? Eur Heart J. 2005;26:1633–1639. - PubMed
-
- Ridker PM, Rifai N, Cook NR, Bradwin G, Buring JE. Non-HDL cholesterol, apolipoproteins A-I and B100, standard lipid measures, lipid ratios, and CRP as risk factors for cardiovascular disease in women. JAMA. 2005;294:326–333. - PubMed
-
- Alipour A, van Oostrom AJHHM, Izraeljan A, Verseyden C, Collins JM, Frayn KN, Plokker TWM, Elte JWF, Castro Cabezas M. Leukocyte activation by triglyceride-rich lipoproteins. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2008;28:792–797. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials